pull down to refresh
43 sats \ 12 replies \ @Satosora 4 Aug \ on: For Territory Bulls Only- Are You Ready For A Fire Sale? meta
I think some territories are great.
Some are unneeded, though.
reply
Even the ones that seem unnecessary can always change their name and focus. Nothing stops an owner from changing the name of a territory and its direction at any time.
reply
reply
I've been wondering about whether we'll see territory mergers. I think they discussed that possibility at some point.
reply
reply
I really hope they do co-ownership soon. That's what we would prefer to do with ~econ.
reply
reply
Me and the current owner, who doesn't have as much time to manage the territory as he would like. I don't know how he feels, but I'm all for having multiple owners and doing an equity sharing arrangement.
reply
Yah, @Undisciplined and I are on same page. I basically try to operate as if donors are co-owners now, but since its just bleeding money, there isnt actually that much to do/control othet than post cost, and I'm where the buck-stops, and also I don't want the liability of accidentally issuing a security, there is no commitment of sharing a claim to anything.