Deconstructionism is really the precurser to woke culture. I remember being taught this crap in college in the late 1970s.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/deconstruction
152 sats \ 2 replies \ @JesseJames 25 Jul
History is written by the Victor, they say....
reply
54 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 25 Jul
Whoever controls the media or the means of communication
reply
76 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 OP 25 Jul
Very true.
reply
161 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 25 Jul
There's no better vindication of his message than that.
reply
86 sats \ 1 reply \ @IamSINGLE 25 Jul
I also had to read this miserable theory and it was taught to us by one of us stackers here. We read it for literature and our culprit was Jaques Derrida!
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 OP 25 Jul
Ah yes. We referred to him (childishly) as Derridouche.
reply
76 sats \ 0 replies \ @Athena 25 Jul
George Orwell! The author of Animal Farm. Thanks! You've taught me another dimension about it to teach to my students.
reply
75 sats \ 0 replies \ @BitcoinAbhi 25 Jul
Its really a crap and it's almost taught everywhere! It's binded to all humanities subjects in college!
reply
95 sats \ 2 replies \ @kepford 25 Jul
In the context of Christianity, which also is being deconstructed I really like what this man said.
~ Chap 4, Death to Deconstruction by Josh Porter
It sums up better than anything I've seen the trend of former Christians "deconstructing" their faith. I put quotes around it because I think it is good and healthy to question authority but to do so with the humility and realization of how dependent we are on those we are subjecting to our judgement. Most don't even seem to understand where the framework they are using came from. We would not even have the frame to use as a guide to judge, without the men we are judging.
There is in general a lack of respect for just how much we owe to those that went before us. Its not as if we built this society and can stand in judgement of all those that have went before. The trends of our time are no different from those that went before. It is not brave to stand with the crowd. When I look around at those that seem to believe they are brave I wonder which side they would have been on in Nazi Germany.
Eventually those that are deconstructing and then condemning Orwell will be condemned by future generations. But as I write this I know it is not true. They won't even be worth deconstructing because they won't be worth remembering.
Those we deconstruct are imperfect. They are flawed as all men are. But their work was so significant that it has stood the test of time despite these flaws. They built on what existed before them. We do the same. We are all standing on the shoulders of giants. Giants that were not perfect, but their work is a part of our history and us. When we just close our eyes and shut our ears we make the choice to cripple our minds. We allow our own arrogance to limit our potential.
reply
75 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 25 Jul
One thing I have noticed with deconstruction is that it often falls along the lines of what the person really wants to do. IE, what they are deconstructing is inconvenient for their life. It seems that it can be post hoc reason to tack on to actions that break their previously held beliefs. I just don't believe in God anymore... therefore I can leave my family and do what I want. But I'm justified in doing that because this whole God thing can't be real.
The other thing I've noticed is that deconstruction makes the deconstructor or feel powerful. They cut these giants of the past down to size. They weren't so great. Look at these flaws! Instead of looking at them and realizing that despite their failures and flaws look what they created. Instead of realizing, I have many flaws. Many I'm probably blind to. How will I be judged? Would I want people to throw out all I have contributed because of these flaws?
Of course most people don't really contribute much(including me). But it is so short sighted to handle people from the past in this way.
reply
75 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 25 Jul
I recommend this book if you are a Christian and see friends losing their faith because of this application of deconstruction.
I didn't have the term at the time but I went through a very deep questioning phase for many of the same reasons many people do. Seeing the flaws in people and transferring that to God. A better phrase that I like to describe this journey is spiritual formation. Basically testing and learning for yourself instead of just accepting the beliefs of others or the church. Working things out as it says in Philippians 2:12.
reply
75 sats \ 6 replies \ @Satosora 25 Jul
I remember his 1984 book.
Thats the one with the book burning and keeping society dumb, right?
reply
41 sats \ 5 replies \ @siggy47 OP 25 Jul
Yes
reply
75 sats \ 4 replies \ @Satosora 25 Jul
That is a very good book.
It has quite a few twists in it!
Seems like it is coming true in a way.
reply
41 sats \ 3 replies \ @siggy47 OP 25 Jul
Very good book. Animal Farm is also a good one.
reply
75 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 25 Jul
I havent read that one.
I will have to give it a try.
reply
54 sats \ 1 reply \ @Bell_curve 25 Jul
1984 is Orwell's magnum opus
beyond a very good book, a warning of the future
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 26 Jul
Yes.
I remember years back they had a dark addition to it....
That was an interesting read, but I cant remember the title.
reply
75 sats \ 3 replies \ @kepford 25 Jul
Agree with you on deconstruction. I think the main issue with it is a lack of humility and perspective. The current man over estimating his own knowledge and mortality and understanding and underestimating that of those that went before.
reply
109 sats \ 1 reply \ @Bell_curve 25 Jul
Chesterton's Fence
reply
75 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 25 Jul
Yep
reply
76 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 OP 25 Jul
Exactly
reply
54 sats \ 3 replies \ @Bell_curve 25 Jul
@siggy47,
you were English or Literature major in college?
reply
21 sats \ 2 replies \ @siggy47 OP 25 Jul
Yes
reply
86 sats \ 1 reply \ @BitcoinAbhi 25 Jul
Then how you became a lawyer?
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 OP 25 Jul
I'm still trying to figure that out. I probably guessed it would be a good way to make a living.
reply
54 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 25 Jul
from daily sceptic:
Step forward Jan Morris and his trilogy Pax Britannica. Now, I haven’t read this non-fictional account of the British Empire but from background knowledge, it’s not in any way a replacement for Orwell or even remotely comparable. It’s an exhaustive historical work, not a personal creative one. But this trilogy was extolled by the students as what Orwell should have done when discussing empire. There was the implication that Orwell could now be – somewhat thankfully – ignored.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @77edb424fc 25 Jul outlawed
stackers have outlawed this. turn on wild west mode in your /settings to see outlawed content.