Yes, its a pretty foolproof way of using and moving data.
Magnetic storage is bad at storing data long term.
reply
That must be why the U.S. and German military used it for half a century and three decades, huh?
reply
Pretty sure they create new copies and test from time to time to mitigate this. When it was introduced, it was state of the art tech. But technically some optical storage would be better.
reply
Show me a medium where this is not true for some duration?
Also, of course there is better. But you said this was BAD. Language is important.
reply
Jazz drives were self contained.
reply
Factory produced CDs (not CD-Rs). I have music CDs produced in 1980s that still work without any issues.
reply
Also, I recall lots of damaged, scratched, unreadable CD-Rs.
reply
CD-Rs are different, they will become unreadable in some 5-10 years without even using them. That's why I said "factory produced CDs (not CD-Rs)". Of course, scratching will destroy them too, just don't do it.
reply
It seems you fail to see the importance of mission. You're talking about consumer data. The USAF secured Nuclear missile tech and the German Navy on warship systems. And you say the medium was 'bad.' 🤣🤣🤣
Lots of scratched disks.
reply
Again, no one said there isn't better. One can argue that something is better without the other thing being bad. But I guess not to some people.
reply
Of course there are different ways. But would you rather have a tried and true tech that others barely use anymore compared to the new things that could be hacked easier?
reply
I still don't buy this "hacked easier" argument. You can buy USB FDDs from Amazon for ~20 EUR.
Hence why you make a copy.
reply