That must be why the U.S. and German military used it for half a century and three decades, huh?
Pretty sure they create new copies and test from time to time to mitigate this. When it was introduced, it was state of the art tech. But technically some optical storage would be better.
reply
Show me a medium where this is not true for some duration?
Also, of course there is better. But you said this was BAD. Language is important.
reply
Jazz drives were self contained.
reply
Factory produced CDs (not CD-Rs). I have music CDs produced in 1980s that still work without any issues.
reply
Also, I recall lots of damaged, scratched, unreadable CD-Rs.
reply
CD-Rs are different, they will become unreadable in some 5-10 years without even using them. That's why I said "factory produced CDs (not CD-Rs)". Of course, scratching will destroy them too, just don't do it.
reply
It seems you fail to see the importance of mission. You're talking about consumer data. The USAF secured Nuclear missile tech and the German Navy on warship systems. And you say the medium was 'bad.' 🤣🤣🤣
reply
It is bad compared to other tech available today. Actually better tech was available already in 1980s, but it was more state of the art, obviously military guys went with older proven tech back then.
reply
Ok, I'll play. Define bad. Because your saying two major NATO military branches (Used to spending unGodly amounts of money on research and tech development) stayed with the 'bad' option for 30 and 50 years.
You were just comparing CDs.
Lots of scratched disks.
reply
Again, no one said there isn't better. One can argue that something is better without the other thing being bad. But I guess not to some people.
reply
Of course there are different ways. But would you rather have a tried and true tech that others barely use anymore compared to the new things that could be hacked easier?
reply
I still don't buy this "hacked easier" argument. You can buy USB FDDs from Amazon for ~20 EUR.
reply