By Llewellyn H. Rockwell Jr.
If we could abolish public schools and compulsory schooling laws, we would have better schools at half the price—and be freer too.
If that were to happen, the kids that want to learn would be learning. The kids that dont want to can learn something else. Society doesnt need 100% thinkers. We also need artist and workers. Can you imagine the amount of propoganda that could be cut out of their "schooling"?
reply
The current school system is based on many false assumptions. For example, kids don't always develop same interests, or if they do, not always at the same time. Age-group classes are therefore a huge mistake. Same as teacher-led education. Maria Montessori got it right.
reply
Maria Montessori got it right.
I agree
reply
You need to standardize it a bit. Or else it would be even worse of a shitshow.
reply
How much is "a bit", though? Can this be determined objectively?
By standardising the curriculum, you are indirectly standardising the kids and that's the cité of the problem, because they are, by the nature of things, different.
Instead, the difference should be encouraged, but this is incompatible with scolarisation, especially on a large scale.
(I use the word "scolarisation" because for me scolarisation and education are not the same)
reply
That's a great term. I've never seen it before.
reply
I've just double-checked, and the correct equivalent in English term is actually "schooling". 😅
Also, I meant to write "the core of the problem" (autocorrect tricked me)
reply
One of the great things about English is that it's flexible enough to incorporate new words. "Scolarisation" deserves to be its own term, although people do make the distinction between "schooling" and "education" that you're highlighting.
reply
I thought you guys were teasing me on the term "standardize".
Society doesnt need 100% thinkers.
So true. My dad and I talk about this all the time. By and large, teachers are incredibly elitist about academics and they really look down on trades people or other regular working people.
The irony is that the system is also terrible at cultivating thinkers.
reply
That is true. Home schooled students are usually more efficient with their thinking.
reply
In the UK, the new leftist government wants to impose 20% vat on private schools tuition fees. This may be unconstitutional because of the discriminatory application of the law, targeting private schools only.
The consequence would be that more children will be forced out of private schools and flood already overwhelmed public schools... 🤦‍♂️
They're deluding themselves if they think the additional tax revenue will contribue to improve public schools, but surely the real plan is to expose as many kids as possible to government propaganda...
reply
The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution.
They couldn't care less about "improving" public schools (in the sense you or I would mean that). They hate the existence of schools not controlled by them and they covet the money parents are spending on tuition.
reply
Spot on!
reply
Outrageous
reply
Kids might actually learn something.
reply
I heard because of covid and the distance learning, many younger students are struggling to read.
reply
The stories coming out of California are nuts. I've read that the median kid is more than a year behind. Something like 50k students never checked-in to their distance learning in LA.
It's really horrific and infuriating that no one is ever going to be held accountable for it.
reply
Yes. They should have just kept them in the schools. The distance learning was a big fiasco. Publicity stunt.
reply
It was also basically two years of paid vacation for government teachers.
reply
I remember hearing how much they complained about having to shift to online learning. My experience with online learning was different, too.
reply
The government should ask for a reimbursement.
reply
I studied in a government school here. There was no fees at all. For those kids who were curious, the education was there. So, it was good for me as well.
Then, I became a teacher in public school. They are there only to make the owners richer. From uniform to tution fees, everything's so costly but the wages are so less comparing those in government schools.
Even, there's a rule here that every school has to teach 25% students whose father has low income (say a poor kid). And their tution fees will be paid by government. But almost no school adheres to this. Instead, they take fees from kids and also take from government.
I want that public schools in India should be abolished. If not all, certainly the fully private ones need to be reprimanded by dismissal.
reply
You and I are just going to be on opposite sides of this one. I'm never going to support taking away choices from parents.
If the public schools are as bad as you say, why does anyone pay for them?
reply
You know the situation in here is quite different. Most of the parents currently has not been to a private school, but now they want to send their kids to these schools because they believe that private schools are the only schools where their kids can learn better. This may be a truth but I was talking about how they are taking too much fees and charges for everything.
More than one-third of the country' s population, around 480 million, is below 18 years. All schools are almost running at full capacity. They know that they can do whatever they want but the strength of students won't be lowering.
reply
It wouldn't surprise me to hear that there's a cultural issue of putting excessive pressure on parents to overspend on their kids' educations. We certainly have similar issues here.
I don't think the right answer is to have the government take away their options, though.
reply
I think it is becoming that way in the USA, too. We have public schools, but all the after school activities are really draining parents bank accounts.
reply
One major problem I have noticed is that both parents now have to work to make ends meet, so they don't have time for the education of their children anymore...
reply
I myself own a small private school in a village. So, I don't want that government take away the options but it certainly needs some improvements.
reply
I see public education as a way of alleviating the widening rich-poor divide. Already, more affluent families are giving their children the best opportunities they can, by sending them for well-regarded tuition and enrichment classes. I feel that public education aims to distribute an equitable amount of resources to schools, regardless of whether they are in rich or poor neighbourhoods, thus giving kids from the lower socioeconomic classes a fighting chance. Or at least that’s how I feel about the state of public education in my country - even if meritocracy is more of a lofty ideal than when I was growing up.
reply
That widening is taking place while we have widespread government education, though.
I know some of the Asian school systems are vastly superior to ours, but the idea that the atrocious government schools in poor American neighborhoods are helping those kids close a gap, is preposterous on its face.
reply
it will be a shame cause not everybody has money for.... it should be accesible to everybody, it s a right
But it seems all around the world is a tendency to privatize every public sector as Health... :(
reply
Health care should never have been nationalised
How many people in England are unhappy with NHS?
reply
Unless you believe in slavery, it's not possible to have a right to something that has to be provided by someone else.
reply
I would also predict a massive reduction in school violence. No doubt in my mind.
reply
Can you imagine how much of a reduction in bullying there would be?
reply
One of the best points I've heard Michael Malice make is that for most people government school is the only place they will ever be the victim of physical violence.
reply
deleted by author
reply
Me too, so far.
reply
I just remembered another time outside of school. But it was the majority for sure.
reply
Public schools aim to provide equal opportunities for education, helping to reduce disparities based on income, race, or background. Without them, educational inequality could worsen, as wealthier families might access better education, while others might be left behind.
reply
Hello friends, since I can remember I have studied in public school, I studied both my primary and secondary school, so today I am a totally integrated person who was educated by teachers who loved both teaching and their profession.
reply