pull down to refresh
42 sats \ 25 replies \ @riberet19 OP 29 Jun freebie \ parent \ on: The Kalergi plan or the "Great Replacement" conspiracy
I think the brainwashing of woke thinking has to do with this, all these ideas come from somewhere, it's been brainwashing the population for a long time, why should white people be eliminated? Is it just a collective delirium or does it have something to do with mind manipulation and brainwashing?
I don’t mean to sound like a chauvinist… women embrace extreme political movements.
Affluent white female leftists are AWFL, pronounced “awful”
Women’s suffrage was connected to the temperance movement which was political not religious.
Prohibition of alcohol sales was possible because women voted for it. Around 2 million American men didn’t vote in 1917-18 because they were in France 🇫🇷 and Belgium 🇧🇪
reply
I dont know man, I think many people embrace extreme political movements when they agree with them.
Not only women.
reply
reply
Many people still think that the solution is still in a left-wing or right-wing party, I think that it will take a long time to change that, people are given two options and they vote for one or the other, they usually have no other alternatives, at least that is what they think, the best thing would be not to perpetrate that corrupt voting system and not to go to vote.
reply
If people don’t like Trump or whoever replaces Biden, they have a third option: vote third party or do not vote
Not voting also sends a message
reply
Exactly, it sends the message that you don't want to perpetrate this archaic system.
reply
Men and women vote differently
reply
I should have said women are more likely than men to be extreme and strident politically.
My favorite women are non political and don’t vote
reply
Extreme movements are embraced by both, but I think it is more normal for this to be done by people with little judgment or reasoning and women are more emotional and are guided more by impulses and beautiful speeches that induce emotionalism, which is less common for men to fall into that, although nowadays reason is being lost even in many men...
reply
And peer pressure and social status
Young women latch on to fashionable trends because their friends are doing it
Women will vote for a man if he is good looking. Brad Pitt would be a successful politician.
1960 debate between Nixon and Kennedy had interesting results:
People who heard the debate on radio said Nixon won. People who saw the debate on television 📺 said Kennedy won.
reply
Everything you say is true, or at least I agree with it, but what happened in the 1960 debate? Why did that happen? I am not an American, so in certain matters I get lost since I have no notions of such events...
reply
My apologies for being a self centered American!
reply
Richard Nixon and John F Kennedy ran for President in 1960. Very close competitive results.
What was special about the 1960 debate was television. First time Presidential debates were televised
reply
The 1960 presidential debates between John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon had a significant impact on public perception and the election outcome. A few key points:
-
The first debate, held on September 26, 1960, was a turning point. Kennedy appeared poised and confident on television, while Nixon looked sweaty and uncomfortable under the studio lights. This contrast in appearance helped Kennedy narrow Nixon's lead in the polls[1][2][4].
-
It's estimated that nearly 100 million Americans tuned into one or more of the four debates, a massive audience at the time[1]. The debates demonstrated the power of television in shaping public opinion.
-
Polls showed that those who listened to the debates on radio thought Nixon had won, while those who watched on TV favored Kennedy. Kennedy's youthful, telegenic appearance gave him an advantage[4].
-
The debates transformed American politics, shaping the behavior of leaders and candidates for decades to come. They set a precedent for the inclusion of debates in all subsequent presidential elections[1][2].
-
However, the debates also marked a shift away from substantive policy discussions. Candidates became more focused on image and personality rather than the issues[4].
So in summary, the 1960 debates captivated the public, boosted Kennedy's campaign, and forever changed the role of television in presidential politics. But they also ushered in an era of style over substance in campaigns.
Sources
[1] Equal Time and the Kennedy-Nixon Debates - College of Liberal Arts https://cla.purdue.edu/academic/history/debate/kennedynixon/index.html
[2] 1960 United States presidential debates - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1960_United_States_presidential_debates
[3] CPD: 1960 Debates https://www.debates.org/debate-history/1960-debates/
[4] Scholarly Analysis of the KennedyNixon Debates https://cla.purdue.edu/academic/history/debate/kennedynixon/kennedynixonscholarly.html
[5] How the Kennedy-Nixon debate changed the world of politics https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/the-debate-that-changed-the-world-of-politics