yes of course from a humanist point of view religion should never be used to divide people into groups. but the reality is that Islam, as it appears today, is clearly politicized and used as a power vehicle.
Islam, as it appears today, is clearly politicized and used as a power vehicle
sadly, in most places it is; but then it doesn't mean all muslims are bad ppl - I'm surrounded by some of the kindest humans and they are Muslims, but I see them as living humans being instead of muslims. đź‘€
reply
Not all Muslim are bad people but their leaders are dangerous.
Muslims have trouble coexisting peacefully with non Muslims.
Muslim countries don’t have a reputation for tolerance and diversity
The religion is about converting the heathens. If they don’t convert, kill the men, rape the women
reply
"Not all Muslim are bad people but their leaders are dangerous"
One can say the exact same thing about foreign policy advisers in Washington or Jerusalem, the evil of all leaders around the world says nothing about the people living in these countries who are in fact the first victims
reply
Fair point
Can Muslims coexist with the West? History has shown us the answer: big fat no
reply
that's not what i said. my point is to show quite clearly that christian islamic or jewish or even atheists cannot be merged into a multicultural paradise. this is a misconception that is turning into a catastrophe before our very eyes
reply
I can coexist with Muslim who convert to anything else
reply
What if s.o. converts to Bidenomics?
reply
I guess multi-respect is the key, ppl used to respect others' religions during the Ottoman time, and even till now, I'm still around Christian and Muslim friends here, but yeah, politically wise, they don't want you to see this is possible, ppl living harmony with each other, and it's been like this for centuries.
reply
Natalia is being deliberately naive to defend Islam
reply
I'm not defending anything...just saying what I seen
reply
If you start to understand monotheistic religions as anger storage media, then the whole thing becomes obvious, which is why we are repeatedly confronted with extreme discharges of aggression, frustration and resentment.
reply
42 sats \ 1 reply \ @clr 28 Jun
If you start to understand monotheistic religions as anger storage media
Why do we have to defend "christianity" (whatever that means) then? Simply as a reaction to wokeness? What does it bring to the table?
reply
i do not believe that any of the old religions can be the answer to wokeism, which is nothing other than the rebirth of communism. this is a battle that we can only fight as individuals, resisting any form of symbol adaptation
reply
And then you add missionaries and pressure to convert… result is conflict and violence
We saw this after the printing press and reformation. 100 years of religious wars
reply
Reading and studying the vita of Mohammed would be important for any muslim. But that's sth. they refuse.
reply