I use ChatGPT frequently and I personally think it's an amazing tool especially for enhancing my learning. I'll ask it questions about human physiology or Bitcoin or football or what have you, and then after I feel somewhat proficient in a subject I'll have it test my knowledge. It's a very active way for me to engage in the process of learning.
But I also understand even when it comes to AI I still need to remember to not trust, and verify. And I'll have conversations with it where it clearly seems to lean in a certain direction and have a bit of bias towards something I'm assuming it was either fed or maybe it's a result of how the current internet is skewed towards this way or the other. Anyhow, even when it clearly is trying to steer me towards a certain way of thinking, I enjoy the conversation because I'll usually maintain my position and try and convince it of understanding my views.
With that being said, the variety of AI that I use is very limited and I would like to experiment with other AI tools that maybe some of you have found useful or intriguing.
I mainly use AI right now for chatting purposes, so what alternatives to ChatGPT have stackers found useful and possibly less biased? And what other AI tools do stackers use on a regular basis?
I’ve been playing around with Venice.ai I like that you can just use it, no registration needed.
reply
Bookmarked, thanks!
reply
Trying it now, thank you! love it.
reply
Super cheap too. There's a What Bitcoin Did about it. Images haven't been great for me though.
reply
Honestly I'm using grok right now (paid X AI). I like the fun mode, it is light hearted and really good. Other than that I am using Vecine now ever since @cristaiji's shoutout!
reply
I haven't used it much, but I've seen some coverage of how ChatGPT and other similar tools have clearly been trained to be biased in certain specific ways. This is often around the sorts of protected group identities that American politics is obsessed with.
reply
I dont think its possible to create an unbiased AI. All AIs are biased because the creators of these models must select the data to be used for training.
Its a question of which bias best suits your needs. You might need a model that is more compliant, or perhaps you want something that is less left leaning. Either way, in order to create this outcome, the creators have to choose which data to include or exclude based on this preference, which is inherently introducing a bias.
reply
Competition is important. We can’t rely on just one LLM.
reply
You make a good point, at the end of the day humans feed AI so naturally they will become bias towards the one's who feed them. I guess that's why it's important to have it decentralized so as users we have more choice to balance out the bias.
reply
Gab.ai
reply
Nice 😊
I am impressed you know Gab
reply
Many know it outside MSM or Reddit echochamber.
reply
Awesome will take a look! Thanks!
reply
All hail the original Tay! ;-)
reply
Chatgpt is a nice improvement and easy to use
reply
It really is!
reply
If you need to generate PPT slides readily from your content, Gamma is the go-to app. I wrote a step-by-step guide for my colleagues: https://diaperfinancingfund.blogspot.com/2024/06/step-by-step-guide-for-teachers-to-use.html?m=1
reply
Cool! Thanks Sensei!
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @OT 26 Jun
I'm not really using any at the moment but I did do an experiment with a few models asking them how to coin join. The bitcoin related ones would list the steps, where as the others withheld that info explaining that it might be against the law.
Lopps Delphi model is pretty good for asking bitcoin related questions
reply
Yea I also use Lopps AI from time to time, useful for Bitcoin related questions for sure! Thanks!
reply
I am not using any AI right now. But I used chat gpt. It was good.
reply