@k00b the "related items" are not so well trained. Check this post for example: #585683 The "related" are totally other thing, when in fact it should display something like this
110 sats \ 1 reply \ @supratic 25 Jun
I don't think there's anything wrong on SN side. The author used non-standard ascii for the title, and those "related items" match perfectly. Moreover, there's no description, so it make it harder to relate items to something that (apart the video itself) has no contents/meaning.
reply
could be because of that non-standard ascii
reply