SN Ideas \ stacker news ~meta

864 sats \ 23 comments \ @Roll 21 Jun meta

-Would it be possible to view who send sats for a post ?

-Would it be possible to get a full details of the daily reward? ---How much you get for posts? ---How much you get for comments? ---How much you get to send sats? ...

-I ve read the guide and faqs, again. I ve viewed posts from users and I still do not understand why some gets sats for a post and some other do not ?

-Is there any limit for a user to send sats always to the same user ?

-Many times, i posted an article but it appears that a similar post has already been posted from other website ? Can it be more accurated ?

-Recently at the end of the day, i v noticed that i m spending more sats that i m earning. So would it be possible to get the balance of the day between i have earn and spend?

I know it is not easy to manage this website. Moreover it s a lot of works, inovation, ..... Thanks cause you have done and you are doing a great job.

view all related items

167 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby 21 Jun

I think it is better not to know who zapped you.

In terms of a balance. On the leaderboard you can see how much you stacked and spent for the day. It will include the rewards you got from the day before under stacked but you can just subtract those out if you want to know the balance.

50 sats \ 0 replies \ @Roll OP 21 Jun

thks

31 sats \ 0 replies \ @riberet19 21 Jun

I wouldn't want people to know that I'm the one sending them sats, I like the privacy of zaps, you don't know where they come from or who sends them to you!

20 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 21 Jun

Before MSM, we got more detailed rewards info. I don't think it was sats from each category, but we saw how we ranked in each.

10 sats \ 5 replies \ @DarthCoin 22 Jun

Your obsession with SN being a faucet to "get sats" is disturbing...

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @Roll OP 22 Jun

You have some strange way to analyze ... as always!!!

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @DarthCoin 22 Jun

https://m.stacker.news/36420

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Roll OP 22 Jun

you do not understand my post

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 22 Jun

and you do not understand what is SN

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Roll OP 22 Jun

You want to have the last word.... Enjoy and Good Luck

259 sats \ 9 replies \ @k00b 21 Jun

If you go to satistics then click on charts, it should be easy to determine how much money is going in and out for some unit of time.

-Would it be possible to view who send sats for a post ?

It's possible, but I prefer it being private.

-Would it be possible to get a full details of the daily reward?

We used to have that but it got lost in the code shuffle.

133 sats \ 5 replies \ @Scoresby 22 Jun

Private zaps is good. I'm a fan.

37 sats \ 4 replies \ @ek 22 Jun freebie

I like the idea of having the option of attaching a message and/or revealing your identity. But default should always be private, yes.

This is also a detail where SN is the complete opposite of nostr which I find interesting. I don't see many complaining about it on nostr.

122 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b 22 Jun

But would people zap more on nostr if it were private? Then again, I think I remember being able to do private zaps on nostr, so maybe that's not a big deal.

Public zaps also lend themselves to human verification which is important when sybils don't have much resistance.

126 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek 22 Jun freebie

But would people zap more on nostr if it were private?

Mhh, didn't think about this yet. So far, I was content with believing that there is less zapping on nostr (solely based on my own experience / anecdotal evidence) because there, zapping is basically just trusted charity vs on SN, there is better UX and clearer purpose via ranking and rewards.

Additionally, nostr is more about social graphs than SN so makes sense that zaps are public by default (like basically everything on nostr).

Then again, I think I remember being able to do private zaps on nostr, so maybe that's not a big deal.

Oh, yes, I forgot. I think I've also seen the option.

206 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby 22 Jun

Great description of the differences between SN and nostr.

Because zaps aren't large economic amounts (often ranging from fractions of pennies to a dollar or so) it feels like public zaps would tilt the signal from zaps too far towards social and away from economic.

I wouldn't be looking at zap amount as much as zap amount + zap sender. Currently, when i see a post with 10k sats, I usually know it's going to be worth checking out, even if the title doesn't grab me. I really enjoy how clean this signal is.

I know SN is not pure economic signal (most sats != most seen content) and that trust plays a role. But I also like that I don't have to think about it too much. Private zaps facilitate this.

I wonder what it would be like if there was a mode of SN front page where the only thing you could see about posts was how much they had been zapped (no title, no stacker name, no date?). It might be an interesting content discovery mode.

17 sats \ 0 replies \ @Roll OP 22 Jun

Thks to all

60 sats \ 0 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 22 Jun

It's possible, but I prefer it being private.

You're not the only one.

50 sats \ 0 replies \ @Roll OP 21 Jun

cheers, i just discovered it thks to @grayruby

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Taft 22 Jun

It's possible, but I prefer it being private.

It should be private.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Msd0457890 22 Jun

I think S.N is a very balanced system, not knowing who supports us and supporting without others knowing seems excellent to me.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @SatsMate 22 Jun

I like the anonymity behind who zaps you alot. The fact that you can see peoples zap outflow to inflow ratio at the end of the day is enough for me to see who is generous.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @16d86e9daa 22 Jun

thanks for this ideas, its very helpful and a important guide for newbies like myself