pull down to refresh

11 sats \ 5 replies \ @ZezzebbulTheMysterious 15 Jun \ parent \ on: What are your thoughts on Bitcoin losing the Darknet bitcoin
Let’s discuss protocols, not coin flavors. Yea, monero is a shitcoin — however: if your life depended on the privacy of a monero payment vs the privacy of a lightning payment, which are you picking?
Should Bitcoin development be trying to make coins more fungible (ala MW)? Should it be introducing graph obfuscation features like decoy ring sig txs and zkproofs?
These are things that shitcoins can experiment with no risk to BTC. When should BTC adopt privacy preserving protocols?
write
preview
148 sats \ 4 replies \ @DarthCoin 15 Jun
If is a shitcoin, there's NO DEBATE, no further discussions. Are meaningless. Case closed.
reply
33 sats \ 2 replies \ @ZezzebbulTheMysterious 15 Jun
Protocols not coins. Should Bitcoin implement privacy protocols?
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @joda 15 Jun
Ecash is VERY private...
It's just custodial with unproven reserves.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @yo2xncv0 17 Jun
It is, but that last part is a pretty major caveat...
It's also not censorship resistant en masse. If a mints database is corrupted, is forced to shut down, or just flat refuses to exchange tokens your ecash is immediately useless
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @0268c1d74a 17 Jun
My God is the only real God and i will obey and never question anything.
reply