pull down to refresh

I don't know why I'm so fascinated with gold confiscations throughout history. But I am.
Here's another one (in addition to the confiscation in 1933 in the United States, see Gold "hoarders" were persecuted in the 1930's, what will happen with bitcoin?).
This is an excerpt from the book Shanghai : the rise and fall of a decadent city, 1842-1949. The context of the excerpt is - the fall of the Nationalists in the city of Shanghai, China, to the Communists. The gold confiscation happened in 1948, the Communists conquered the city in 1949.
On August 19, in a last desperate measure to restore economic stability, Chiang played what the Chinese newspapers would later call his “last trump card.” He announced the replacement of the old currency by a “gold yuan,” which would be convertible from the old Chinese dollar at the rate of three million to one and pegged at one gold yuan to four American dollars.
Under penalty of death, all Chinese holding gold, silver, or foreign or Chinese currency were required to surrender their wealth to the Central Bank in exchange for the new gold yuan. To coerce the reluctant citizenry into complying with this draconian measure, Chiang Kai-shek appointed his Russianeducated son, Chiang Ching-kuo, commissioner of the program, sending him to Shanghai, where the pickings were richest. Approaching his assignment with vigor and severity, Chiang organized a large force of spies and police, who used Soviet-style methods to terrorize the public into compliance.
He declared his intention to search private homes for all currency and valuables that had not been turned over to the authorities. Then he sent trucks into wealthy neighborhoods to announce through loudspeakers that the trucks contained special instruments capable of detecting the presence of hidden gold, silver, and other valuables, even those buried underground.
These and other similarly heavy-handed tactics succeeded in frightening scores of law-abiding citizens into handing over their life savings for fear of arrest. Wages and prices were also frozen, and shopkeepers were forced to sell their goods at the artificial prices. To curb the black market, Chiang Ching-kuo had his secret police comb the waterfront in search of warehouses with stores of hoarded goods. Numerous culprits were arrested and a few of them, among them several prominent businessmen, publicly executed as a warning to others.
But the gold yuan slipped after a month, becoming as worthless as its predecessor. As ineptly handled as everything else the Nationalists did, the attempt at reform failed, because the government had done nothing to increase its revenues or decrease its spending. Moreover, the “reform at pistol point” had antagonized the business community in Shanghai and brought about food shortages and the ruin of many shopkeepers and merchants. Worst of all, Chiang Kai-shek had irreparably alienated the last of his supporters, the urban middle class, who had surrendered their life savings in hopes of resuscitating the economy. Instead, they had lost everything; they’d been robbed and “shaken down” by their government.
this territory is moderated
There are a few other notable examples:
  • United States (1933) EO 6102 - we all know this story
  • Australia Banking act of 1959 Gold may only be sold to the Central Bank.
  • Nazi Germany 1938-1945 - Gold, Art, and other valuable assets were forcibly seized from Jewish people and other groups. Among other things, all gold dental work was removed from the mouths of holocaust victims.
  • India 1963 and 1991: In 1963, the Gold Control Act banned citizens from holding pure gold bars and coins. In 1991, amid an economic crisis, India was forced to pledge its gold reserves as collateral for a loan from the International Monetary Fund.
  • United Kingdom (1966-1971): Gold import restrictions and Citizens were required to declare and sell gold holdings to the Bank of England.
reply
Thanks for the reference to the Australia Banking act of 1959. I had heard of it before, and actually went so far as to try to research, in contemporary newspapers, the public reaction to it. I didn't get very far, though, couldn't find old newspaper archives from that time period.
Any Aussies who could dig into this? Curious minds would like to know.
These topics show up in literature as well. For instance in the (amazing) novels of Nevil Shute, the topics of capital controls and hiding assets frequently come up. A couple that spring to mind right away are The Far Country and Trustee From the Toolroom. I highly recommend both of them, though Trustee from the Toolroom is quite a bit more popular.
reply
Do you read stuff specifically trying to find new gold-hoarding examples, or is this just serendipity?
reply
I have a strange fascination with disasters. Maybe not so strange, I think a lot of people are interested in disasters - probably a human impulse to learn to avoid disasters by learning more about them.
So anyway, I've read a lot on the fall of Shanghai, among other similar historical events. There was a reference in one of them to the incident where they sent trucks out with loudspeakers, stating that they had sensors that could find gold and silver even when buried or hidden in the walls.
That story really stuck in my memory. Then I ran into the book above, and specifically searched for the story.
reply
I found the book where I originally saw the mention of loudspeakers on trucks, telling people to turn in their gold and other valuables for the new currency, "gold yuans", which became just as worthless as the previous yuans within a short period of time.
It's in Last Boat Out Of Shanghai, by Helen Zia. It's a compilation of stories from various refugees from China, all coming from different circumstances. Super read, I'm going through it again.
reply
Events from previous life?
I've had a lot of that coming back through the years, some of it matching with know, historical variants of architecture and so on...
Then also quite a bit from ~100 years ago when hyperinflation hit, explains the somewhat similar intuitions I've had since I was even a teenager!
reply
142 sats \ 3 replies \ @OT 4 Jun
What’s the Bitcoin equivalent? Sacrifice a bunch of influencers and then threaten everyone on X, nostr and SN that they have “special” intelligence on how much Bitcoin we have?
reply
I think this is pretty close. Sacrifice influencers, big fish to start, but moving down the food chain. You don't need special intelligence or trucks w/ loudspeakers to find people who have transacted on exchanges -- anybody who's ever done the slightest non-trivial thing w/ btc (e.g., used it to buy something, or send to someone, or even to yourself) has an untangle-able ball of knots of capital gains obligations to report.
Maxis think the 'boating accident' defense is a defense, which is cute. If you've ever been audited you know who has to explain what to who, and what the consequences are of not providing a satisfying account. Rest assured that the government's lawyers will outlast yours.
Grabbing up a bunch of large, medium, small fish will be enough to make that nightmare vivid enough to crater 95% of self-sovereign btc activity in the USA. Since every other government shares the same interest of not having some new set of elites displace the existing ones, it shouldn't be hard to gather enough of a coalition to make the net global.
At least, that's my hypothesis. We'll have an empirical test of it coming up.
reply
Government in 2030 driving around with loudspeakers:
“Give us your bitcoins.. we have an AI software that can read your mind and extract your 12 words!”
Normies: “Eeh.. ok.. here are my private keys. Can I go back to watch my Netflix now?”
reply
Hmm....
I think war. War offers a pretext for anything and everything. Under cover of war, you could demonize bitcoin holders, change the terminology (not self-custodial but "unhosted", things like that), push stories about terrorists and "our enemies" using bitcoin.
Actually I can see things happening in this order -
  • propaganda about terrorists, child traffickers using bitcoin
  • promotion of chain analysis and how effective it is to prevent the above
  • then - you must, at the very least, register your public keys so the government can track your bitcoin and make sure you're not a baddie.
  • finally - no more self-custody, only "hosted wallets"
Of course bitcoin is so different from gold, thank goodness. Hopefully the future is a lot brighter.
reply
34 sats \ 1 reply \ @BTCFC 4 Jun
Very interesting! I also find the banning of meat throughout history to be intriguing and the confiscation of arms as well. Similar to the confiscation of gold, both the banning of meat and confiscation of arms (ie firearms and swords) may be manipulatively reasoned to be for the benefit of everyone when in fact it has always been about oppression and the centralization of power. Because guess who was eating a crap ton of meat while the people were prohibited to? The ones who enforced such ridiculous rules, with the guns and swords they confiscated!
reply
Interesting - please tell us more. I haven't heard of (explicit) bans on meat historically, though it happens a lot just through poverty.
reply
Sooo warning for this so called gold backed brics currency thats been shilled around?
reply
Oh yeah, for sure. The gold yuan (which is what the Nationalists supposedly confiscated the gold to create) only lasted for months before it, too, was hyperinflated and worthless.
Of course we all know these stories.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @jan 20 Sep
Super interesting. I've also found the history of Rome related to clipping gold coins interesting. People would clip or shave tiny amounts off coins, melt them together and sell them.
reply
I think in history there will be regimes that try to confiscate Bitcoin just like we saw with previous instances of gold confiscation throughout world history.
The thing is, people now have options and tax-friendly jurisdictions like Malta, Bahamas, or best yet - El Salvador.
They will catch a few prominent bitcoiners and make an example out of them - i'm sure a fraction of plebs will willfully give their keys away to the government to avoid jail time. The lion's share from my view will be quiet and they will keep stacking. Many bitcoiners have their plan b option if shit hits the fan in their home country. The sovereign individual thesis may just play out in real time if gold confiscation occurs.
reply
excellent topic to study, thanks for sharing, I particularly think that the day will come when they want to do the same or something similar with bitcoin, and this is where those bitcoiners who have done their homework with concealment techniques, and have remained silent about knowing or having bitcoin will be the ones who can prevail, on the contrary those who are very public, with a visible face, be they content creators or simply a normal citizen who today the norm is to publish on platforms such as FB or WS (Facebook or Whatsapp) everything What you do or let them do, they will be the first to be attacked and forced to talk about their Bitcoin. In a podcast I heard from @lunaticoin with @Dragonoroplata. Dragon told about testimonies from people who were there when the "executive order 6102" was issued and saw how those who handed over their gold to comply with the law and the aforementioned order, were returned green pieces of paper (dollars) in an equivalent of $17 - $16 per ounce. ...To see later after the national collection, how they came out to say that obviously as gold reserves increased it now cost approximately $36 per ounce. And thus seeing how the purchasing power of dollars was degraded without the common people realizing it. On the other hand, those rebels of the time who refused to comply with that order, or rather those more awakened individuals refused to hand over anything, hid it and hid themselves, to later see how their assets (gold) remained safe and were now has been revaluating Fiat compared to its counterpart, if you wanted to acquire it with papers it was now costing much more than before the government's executive order was issued to expropriate the gold of its citizens.
reply
First off...Chiang Kai-shek was not a good guy in any way. He paints himself as a savior in Taiwan...but he stole and murdered so many people.
reply
How scary this post is!
reply
interesting! Somewhat related, I heard recently, from a unreliable source, that way back in the day the introduction of the gold standard, whatever form that took, pissed off everyone who was using a silver standard. Do you know if this has any truth to it?
reply
I think the gold standard was just a society-wide consensus that evolved.
Based on The Bitcoin Standard by Saifedean Ammous, the countries that were mostly on a silver standard instead of gold suffered greatly, in the sense that their wealth was purchased cheap, by foreigners with the "harder" money - gold.
The history of money section in The Bitcoin Standard was a revelation to me. I love history and read a lot, and had never encountered that angle. And it made so much sense.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @om 4 Jun
Wow. And the other choice was Mao Zedong. Poor guys.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Sajjad 4 Jun
Hi
reply
What is better than collecting 22 satoshis one by one in the zbd program and after they reach 10,000, give it to the news stacker, which I thought to myself would increase it, and now I have nothing.
Now I am too :)
reply
I find it interesting that the modern version of gold ownership seems to be even more precarious. Obviously, in these days there were not as many investment vehicles for people to hold wealth in gold, whilst today, excluding the exclusivity of storing gold in personal vaults and safety deposit boxes, the historically well-educated may take physical possession of their gold. How much easier would it be to automate the mandate today?
As i understand, In this time, many left with their wealth to places out of the sphere of influence of the in-fighting between the political factions. I heard stories of grandfathers hiding gold and other stores of wealth in the most difficult places to find, others that left with it out of the country. I guess that there would be warning signs coming and those with the resources would flee or guard their wealth, while the less fortunate were strung up monkeys to scare the chickens. Interesting.