The global farmers' protests are now several months behind us and nothing has changed structurally. We still have to take note of how certain institutions such as the European Union are actively targeting food chains and the production of agricultural goods. Always with the argument of their climate rescue plan! Now it was the humanists at the World Bank who launched the next wave of attacks on our food production with a special proposal.

The 'experts' of the World Bank have suggested sweeping changes to global agriculture to meet "net zero emissions" goals. This proposal aims to centralize farming operations, which critics argue could drastically cut food production and lead to widespread famine.

The report claims these changes will help feed a growing population sustainably, but skeptics warn that reducing agricultural output could have dire consequences. Axel van Trostenburg of the World Bank argues that transforming food systems is crucial for reducing climate emissions and improving planetary health.

However, the plan's critics highlight the risks of such a centralized approach, pointing to the potential for economic disruption and increased vulnerability for the poorest populations. They argue that localized, diverse farming practices are better for the environment and food security.

The World Bank estimates that achieving these emissions targets will require annual investments of $260 billion, promising over $4 trillion in benefits. Yet, many fear that these ambitious plans overlook the complexities of global agriculture, potentially leading to food shortages and economic instability.

https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/406c71a3-c13f-49cd-8f3f-a071715858fb