No, we concluded that people do not discuss the minimum anonset (number of unique users) necessary for an ecash mint's claims about privacy to be true. And it would be good if they did.
Nor did I say ecash has nothing useful to do with bitcoin. It is not bitcoin but may be useful to bitcoin.
You may have concluded these things but I am not convinced by the arguments you presented.
Nor did I say ecash has nothing useful to do with bitcoin. It is not bitcoin but may be useful to bitcoin.
This is self-contradicting
The latter part is conditional, it's no more related or useful to Bitcoin than SQL is
reply
I'm confused by what you are saying.
Do you think there is anything that is not bitcoin but is useful to it?
reply
Yes, what I'm saying is that ECash is less useful than SQL
reply
That's fine. I don't care whether it is less or more useful than SQL. I'm interested in what its uses might be. And whether we can do something with it that is good for freedom money.
reply
It's useful for people that hate freedom money
reply
Now I think you're just getting offensive for no reason. @Scoresby and I don't hate Bitcoin, we just genuinely think that ecash can help bitcoin scale. (@Scoresby, am I being fair to you?)
reply
Didn't say you did, you haven't found a use for it.
You are just twisting yourself into knots because it's easier for the ECash people to scam you than it is for you to admit you've been scammed.
ECash is lies, just admit you fell for it, learn and move on.
reply
So why don't you actually put your thoughts down and make the case in a post? Just arguing in the comments here isn't very coherent.
reply
reply
I've seen your project. I'm asking for a defense of your views about ecash.