0 sats \ 11 replies \ @Fabs 23 May \ on: Which territories will not survive next month? And next year? oracle
Wtf, man?! That's like asking "which companies do you think will go bankrupt in the coming month(s)?, just for fun, ha ha".
Pointless post.
The initial dot.com boom had a site that did exactly that, believe it or not.
reply
Fascinating
reply
well, we are in ~oracle so just wondering if someone has any prediction! your comment is not relevant and does not add any value. You could have saved a sat ;)
Some time is just fun to look back and see who had a good gut feeling
FYI: you win a
downzapreply
Man, you're not only childish, you're an idiot at that!
Here, another chance to waste sats, idiot.
Edit: "your comment is not relevant and does not add any value. You could have saved a sat ;)" literally applies to your post; it's devoid of value, just speculation, and the whole list of @dds are probably a try to get some views and / or sats.
Wtf, man. Go and spend your whole balance on down zapping me, you irrelevant little kid.
reply
Okay, but also @ek asked the same question a couple of months ago (in the same territory).
reply
Nice find! I like the values @ek used for his prediction:
- Are they related to bitcoin in some way?
- Is there a dedicated stacker behind them that probably won't give up easy and might still make it work (if it doesn't already)?
- How much organic activity is there already?
- Did the founder react to the maintenance costs in some way on SN? If so, how?
reply
reply
The point was that it's something that's recurred as a topic and seems to have generated actual discussion twice (at least). And beyond that, I think it's something that makes sense in a forum built on V4V to discuss what kind of value people are getting; inherent to the notion that a territory won't continue is the idea that it's not worth the fees the territory owner is paying (which is not the same as saying it's a failure, because everyone has different value thresholds).
reply
Go Ahead, point out "what kind of value people are getting" in "Has been interesting to see so many territories popping up in the past few months, some brave ones are still trying, but honestly, I cannot see how a territory could be sustainable, imagine it being profitable... atm is utopia!
Just for fun, which territories you think will be the ones being kicked out (not renewed) next month? And what about the ones out next year?"
It reads like "what do you guys think will be the losers of the coming month? And year?
If the post was structured and worded different, as in; "which territory seems to provide the most value to people, and receives back the most? Which doesn't?"
Then I would've reacted differently, but the above post is simply stupid.
reply