The only question is how many more conflicts will it take for us to start calling these times WWIII. Readers of history in the future will say it started in the 2010s.
The risk of being misgendered would be too strong in the army. And how would they make sure that everybody would be addressed with their correct pronouns? I doubt you can get an iced matcha soy latte in the army either.
The anti-federalists were opposed to the Constitution not because they disapproved of its weak federal government and demanded something stronger, something more like what we have today, but because they disapproved of a federal government at all. In other words, the vision Dalio now derides and implies is the precursor to civil war was, in fact, the most radically centralized of the forms of government considered by the Founders.
I think he made a typo and meant decentralized in the last sentence of the quoted paragraph. Having no federal government and more state rights would not lead to more centralization.
Told you he was a communist @k00b Bridgewater has heavy bags in China. Now he's trying to scare the average working American.
I know he has China bags. You said that makes him a communist and anti-American.
Now he is inciting a civil war to secure his bags.
Predicting something is not inciting something.
It's called to cause harm.
If I predict a hurricane am I trying to cause harm or prevent it?
Dalio can be your boogey man if you want, but your feelings about his intentions are just feelings.
You would be a weatherman. Using data and analysis. It's the same thing.
The only question is how many more conflicts will it take for us to start calling these times WWIII. Readers of history in the future will say it started in the 2010s.
Doomer wants attention
I tried to read Ray Dalio's book, whatever it was. I couldn't finish it.
35 to 40 is an alarming odd. But we can still not have it as the odds are against it. But a good article overall! Thanks for sharing
It’s also never going to happen. Bunch of lazy spoiled brats.
The risk of being misgendered would be too strong in the army. And how would they make sure that everybody would be addressed with their correct pronouns? I doubt you can get an iced matcha soy latte in the army either.
I think he made a typo and meant decentralized in the last sentence of the quoted paragraph. Having no federal government and more state rights would not lead to more centralization.