pull down to refresh

54 sats \ 4 replies \ @Fabs OP 19 May \ parent \ on: @Fabs's bio
Awesome. I'll refine the text along with the above points, which enables you to use it as a smooth introduction when announcing the transition from the current top-post contest to the Bitcoin-centered writing contest in the upcoming Friday's newsletter.
Really nothing you'd want to see added or changed?
Also: are you going to transition the current top-post reward(s) (5k) onto the writing contest as well, or are you going to stay at the 2.5k?
Either way is fine by me, but if you're going to up it, I'd up my part towards the rewards as well. 🤠
write
preview
30 sats \ 3 replies \ @siggy47 19 May
I think you covered everything well. What's your sense on the rewards? Certainly I'll toss in 2.5k like now, but if you want me to boost it and you intend to match it, that would be a 10k per week contest. Pretty good motivation, I guess.
reply
54 sats \ 2 replies \ @Fabs OP 19 May
Well, as stated in the post, I'd like to initially issue a 5k reward, and depending on the interest, I'd use the zaps received on both Monday's and Friday's post to gradually increase said reward.
  • We'd have to make the latter clear, though: Zaps = higher (future) rewards; they can influence the rewards with their âš¡.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @siggy47 19 May
Makes sense. You make the post, then I'll reinforce it in the newsletter. Then I can contribute more in the future too. I like your idea of reward based on zaps to at least some extent.
reply
54 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fabs OP 19 May
Awesome, 'till Friday, partner!
reply