@Fabs's bio \ stacker news

pull down to refresh

30 sats \ 25 comments \ @Fabs 28 Dec 2023

Allow me to introduce my motivations on Stacker.News; I want to earn cheap Sats, that's pretty much it.

Oh, and I absolutely adore the fact that SN is a working, Bitcoin-centered Social Media. Therefore I'd like to support the site with my occasional and modest brain farts, all in strive for adoption !

0 sats \ 5 replies \ @siggy47 19 May

I really like your ideas here, especially the v4v point. One thing- let's wait for next week to start. You can announce it whenever you want, but I think I should announce I am stopping my other contest first. They both finish on Fridays, and I would rather everyone focus on yours. I will promote it more in Friday's newsletter when I announce cancellation of the old contest.

54 sats \ 4 replies \ @Fabs OP 19 May

Awesome. I'll refine the text along with the above points, which enables you to use it as a smooth introduction when announcing the transition from the current top-post contest to the Bitcoin-centered writing contest in the upcoming Friday's newsletter.

Really nothing you'd want to see added or changed?

Also: are you going to transition the current top-post reward(s) (5k) onto the writing contest as well, or are you going to stay at the 2.5k?

Either way is fine by me, but if you're going to up it, I'd up my part towards the rewards as well. 🤠

30 sats \ 3 replies \ @siggy47 19 May

I think you covered everything well. What's your sense on the rewards? Certainly I'll toss in 2.5k like now, but if you want me to boost it and you intend to match it, that would be a 10k per week contest. Pretty good motivation, I guess.

54 sats \ 2 replies \ @Fabs OP 19 May

Well, as stated in the post, I'd like to initially issue a 5k reward, and depending on the interest, I'd use the zaps received on both Monday's and Friday's post to gradually increase said reward.

We'd have to make the latter clear, though: Zaps = higher (future) rewards; they can influence the rewards with their ⚡.

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @siggy47 19 May

Makes sense. You make the post, then I'll reinforce it in the newsletter. Then I can contribute more in the future too. I like your idea of reward based on zaps to at least some extent.

54 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fabs OP 19 May

Awesome, 'till Friday, partner!

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 4 Apr

Nice profile picture, reminds me of mine :)

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fabs OP 4 Apr

🤭, thanks, it's thought to be a reflection of my magnificence :)

We can be magnificent together, if you want? 😋

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nym 3 Apr

Welcome aboard!

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @doofus 19 Feb

Welcome to the Final Frontier!

4 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fabs OP 19 Feb

It scares me... Fellow fellow...

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @TNStacker 28 Dec 2023

Welcome!

Stack sats, stay humble

54 sats \ 6 replies \ @Fabs OP 31 May

deleted by author

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @siggy47 31 May

deleted by author

54 sats \ 3 replies \ @Fabs OP 31 May

deleted by author

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @siggy47 31 May

deleted by author

54 sats \ 1 reply \ @Fabs OP 31 May

I think it would be better from now on to count original submissions as separate posts to qualify for the contest.

This is already possible. There's nothing said about it having to be a comment, only the doc, link or whatever to the work.

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 31 May

Okay, but maybe that's confusing. Can you explain it again so everyone understands that. I missed it!

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 31 May

deleted by author

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fabs OP 31 May

deleted by author

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @siggy47 24 May

deleted by author

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Fabs OP 24 May

Do you have the initial link I've send you in an invoice? I thought I've saved it, but I didn't.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 24 May

sender information: Fabs @stacker.news (identifier) sender says: https://docs.google.com/document/d/14yITMyBt_wUghyt4GWogw_yw5dMxPOxIDFjih4hf_nA/edit?usp=drivesdk Initial draft outlining the competition. Let me know what you'd keep or change, and especially what you think of the latter part. - Fabs.confirmed

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fabs OP 24 May

deleted by author

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Eobard 28 Dec 2023

deleted by author