pull down to refresh
trust not to leak private data that's the point op is making
I agree. The point I am trying to make is that mints are not self-custodial. You are giving away your precious sats in exchange for eSats issued by the mint.
My understanding is that back in the day private banks would eventually end up rug pulling their customers, which led to the creation of central banks. It looks like these mints might end up the same way. I am not enthusiastic about mints.
what is being built is being built for transactions
not for saving
Please let me reframe that:
What is being built is for people who are/will be too poor to open a lightning channel.
Lightning already works perfectly for transactions.
everyone on earth spends money
if you listen or read calle's posts its always about transactions
Or too cheap to open a lightning channel
it's more:
for people who want privacy, offline tx, or programmable money
and if you don't like mints, don't use them
you are totally right and we are all responsible for educating users about this
ecash is for spending, just like starbucks vouchers
don't keep all your ecash on one mint
for saving, you use your own mint, or swap out to on chain
Phoenix / muun are recoverable indeed, that is definitely a valuable feature
WoS, Blink and other CUSTODIAL solutions are fully deprecated by mints
for phoenix / muun the question is whether the privacy aspects are worth it for the faster transaction times (and connectivity / reliability)
Mutiny wallet is also self custodial, would you being putting them in the same level?
No, Mutiny is great, although force closures are a pain
Haven't tried it with Fedi yet
Phoenix is self-custodial (although not private). Not sure why put Phoenix and WoS at the same level.