reply on: deleted by author \ stacker news ~meta

pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 7 replies \ @Fabs 4 Apr \ parent \ on: deleted by author meta

That's one way to try and justify it.

21 sats \ 6 replies \ @Lux 4 Apr

to pay more for a shittier product/service is just retarded

0 sats \ 5 replies \ @Fabs 4 Apr

I simply see it as a form of exploitation of someone else's situation, must be a morals-thing.

121 sats \ 4 replies \ @Lux 4 Apr

So it's better to not help them at all? But who is the "exploiter" here, did you devalue their currency?

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Fabs 4 Apr

You're trying to make a point by going all-in on the "we're helping them" argument, but fact is: people don't think nor care about whether or not we're "helping" them with our consumerism, or not. That's it. People go there because it's pretty and cheap, not because they wanna do good.

110 sats \ 1 reply \ @Lux 4 Apr

I grew up in a shittier place than western standard, and if it wasn't for westerners coming here because is pretty and cheaper, my standard of living would be much worse. I get your msg, but it's not that simple.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fabs 4 Apr

Good, then we can end it here.

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fabs 4 Apr

And no, I didn't devalue their currency, neither do I profit off of it.