reply on: Coinbase Selects Lightspark for Lightning \ stacker news ~bitcoin

pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 28 replies \ @kr 3 Apr \ parent \ on: Coinbase Selects Lightspark for Lightning bitcoin

what are you even saying?

22 sats \ 27 replies \ @DarthCoin 3 Apr freebie

Are you in Bitcoin from yersterday? You really don't know who is Conbase and what they trying to do? You really don't know who is LightSpark and what they are trying to do? cmooon

Maybe they can fool some noobs that enter into Bitcoinlandia today, but not old bitcoiners.

People should stop using Coinbase at all ! I really do not understand why people still uses that trap!

11 sats \ 26 replies \ @kr 3 Apr

so because you don’t like Coinbase, you don’t want to let their tens of millions of customers get access to the Lightning Network?

i thought Bitcoin was supposed to be accessible to everyone… how is this not a step in the right direction?

25 sats \ 1 reply \ @Coinsreporter 4 Apr

Good point. Everyone, no matter where they are in their journey with Bitcoin, should have every right to access lightning. Binance has integrated it much before and people loved that instantly.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @SpaceHodler 30 Apr

I tried LN deposits on Binance some time ago and it worked. Then I wanted to use it again and the option wasn't available.

81 sats \ 0 replies \ @Darthcoin_Cash 3 Apr

I apologize for my old version, he is a bit outdated and not able to communicate well. Darthcoin Cash is the real Darthcoin.

0 sats \ 22 replies \ @DarthCoin 3 Apr

LOL you really think is about that I like or not Conbase? Damn it, read here why #78930

0 sats \ 21 replies \ @kr 3 Apr

thanks for sharing that link, but you dodged my first question.

given that Coinbase already has tens of millions of customers, is it not a good thing that they will have access to Lightning?

0 sats \ 7 replies \ @DarthCoin 3 Apr

is it not a good thing that they will have access to Lightning?

NO. Those losers must be informed about the dangers of using Conbase. Not just for them, but for all the rest of users.

In other words, promoting Conbase and Lightspark is doing more damage than good.

0 sats \ 6 replies \ @kr 3 Apr

you lost me, definitely disagree on this one

51 sats \ 5 replies \ @DarthCoin 3 Apr

@remindme 1 year

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 3 Apr

Will you eat your dick if you're wrong that Coinbase integrating Lightning is not good for Bitcoin?

reply on another page

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @kr 3 Apr

despite our disagreement, i must admit this is a good use of the remindme bot

view replies

21 sats \ 12 replies \ @javier 3 Apr

Well, if @DarthCoin and others are right and they are doing fractional reserve on Bitcoin, I don't think that's a good thing, it only means more ways to scam.

0 sats \ 11 replies \ @kr 3 Apr

how could a lightning integration possibly mean “more ways to scam”?

50 sats \ 10 replies \ @javier 3 Apr

Lightning is just a tool, can be used for good and for bad. Like Bitcoin. If a scam is run on Bitcoin, that doesn't make the scam less scammy.

0 sats \ 9 replies \ @kr 3 Apr

ok, but you’re implying a scam is already occurring, how does adding Lightning make things any worse?

view replies