Russian FSB is saying the shooters have ties to Ukraine and were headed for the border
- organized on telegram?
- shooter paid $5400?
- 4 of detainees known terrorists?
pull down to refresh
related posts
pull down to refresh
Russian FSB is saying the shooters have ties to Ukraine and were headed for the border
Don’t know if it’s fake and don’t really care. That sucks for the dead people.
On the other hand, people who don’t value their lives enough to take the necessary steps for personal security, don’t inspire a high level of sympathy, either.
It’s one thing if your wife poisons your sandwich, quite another when you are in a public place where you should be prepared for bad things and bad people.
Sputnik is pure psyop propaganda. I wouldnt put too much faith in the content.
Oh I'm sure. Centralized news is dinosaur. Do you think the shooting is a psyop?
Terrorism is a psyop. Literally. That's the point.
Psyop doesn't always mean fake.
It was a spring equinox sacrifice ritual
#477105
I couldn’t imagine first why would you add this to the conspiracy territory, after seeing “ties to Ukraine” I understand.
I own the territory, and I thought people might want to speculate. A crime committed by a large number of people is a conspiracy after all. Also didn't know if it was already in news, didn't see that it was, but thought it probably was.
All good :) there isn’t News territory anymore, too bad.
It is a conspiracy #477105
The shooting was a ritual sacrifice
#477105
The comments in the article are interesting
It’s not ISIS, people are saying
Get better news sources.
Don't come here telling us what Russia said. Dig deeper. Don't spread misinformation.
False claims on your part, indicating projection. I just provided the link I saw in addition to various claims I saw in multiple locations (with question marks). I'm not afraid of seeing articles that have things that are untrue in them, or if others do, as you seem to be. I'm not afraid of mistruth existing in the world, as you seem to be. It is just opportunities to make corrections.
I notice you did not bring any new information, nor did you correct any of what you see to be misinformation, nor did you provide any additional sources. It seems to me that intellectual integrity would dictate that you do, given what you've stated.
Feel free to do so, or start a new post in any way you wish.