50 sats \ 12 replies \ @Undisciplined 15 Mar \ parent \ on: Stacker Sports-Day 101- Rivalry Game (The Duel) Stacker_Sports
I'm surprised I missed the Keenan Allen news. He always torched us, so I'm glad to not be seeing him twice a year anymore.
That sounds like a great situation for a rookie quarterback. I look forward to seeing how the Bears manage to screw it up.
He is awesome. He and Moore will be a dynamic duo for Williams but to your point the Bears will find a way to mess it up.
reply
I know if the Raiders had the first pick, I'd be so nervous about them blowing it. I think I'd rather them just trade it for a huge haul of later and future picks.
reply
reply
That's pretty good for an outlander. I'm not sure if they'd take a DT that high after the Wilkins signing and drafting 4 DT's in the past two drafts. The safety room is also pretty solid, so depending who else was there, they might go another direction.
You nailed the first two though. I think that's very likely what will happen.
It's interesting how all the pundits have Nix and Penix potentially going early first round, when these mocks consistently have them as late 1's to mid 2's.
reply
Would you go WR in 3rd. I kind of regretted not getting a WR. As for needs, beyond what I knew QB and OLine, I went with what PFN suggested. I took the S because he was good value at 112.
reply
The 3rd round is a slightly tricky spot for us. Other than a guard, I don't think 3rd rounders have much chance to get on the field at our other positions. I guess that means BPA is the way to go.
CB and guard are the two positions where we're still looking for a starter. Safety and WR are probably our two fullest position rooms.
reply
Should we pick one stacker’s team per week and all submit a mock draft and have them vote?
Winner gets some sats.
reply
That sounds fun. What do the 49ers need to stock up on? Maybe a backup punter.
If you hit on a top 5 QB it can carry your franchise for a decade or more but if you miss and so many are misses it can screw up your franchise for a decade.
reply