hehehe, this is another way to coinjoin sats.... send sats to anon, then get them back through rewards 😂😂😂
few

ha, tipping anon good sats. all goes to rewards
anon wouldn't have it any other way

anon

this might old but maybe useful reading
https://www.eff.org/de/deeplinks/2014/04/warrant-canary-faq

Stacker Saloon

saloon

> Headlines from a major news source demonstrating that the update could not have been created prior to that date.

Oh, very important detail that I didn't think about, thanks!

You also saved me from searching for examples.

> it does not prevent them from using force to coerce IVPN to produce false declarations.  

Mhh, how could they force you if you "lose the key" to create signatures after you have been approached?