whatever you do, if you decide to implement this, it needs to be done on a relatively short time inverval, eg month otherwise the canary warning is delayed to the users
Headlines from a major news source demonstrating that the update could not have been created prior to that date.
Oh, very important detail that I didn't think about, thanks!
You also saved me from searching for examples.
it does not prevent them from using force to coerce IVPN to produce false declarations.
Mhh, how could they force you if you "lose the key" to create signatures after you have been approached?
reply
1057 sats \ 10 replies \ @anon 12 Mar
this might old but maybe useful reading https://www.eff.org/de/deeplinks/2014/04/warrant-canary-faq
reply
100 sats \ 9 replies \ @anon 12 Mar
ha, tipping anon good sats. all goes to rewards anon wouldn't have it any other way
reply
hehehe, this is another way to coinjoin sats.... send sats to anon, then get them back through rewards 😂😂😂 few
reply
😂 madness
reply
I know, this @anon is special :)
reply
all anons are special nothing special about this anon for there is no this anon :)
reply
this @anon is much deep 👀
reply
this @anon is so deep, they are stuck being @anon
reply