100 sats \ 4 replies \ @ch0k1 8 Mar
Has anyone tried it already?
Any feedbacks will be more than welcome.
reply
144 sats \ 1 reply \ @nout OP 8 Mar
I'm not a fan of the concept, but I understand it will happen no matter what and at least this is not as heavy on chain.
In terms of UX - It's not clear ahead of time how many sats you need to create a shitcoin or even that you have to fund the wallet first to actually create the shitcoin. Also it's not clear how and when was the seed generated for my wallet, how to back it up, is it still there when I refresh, etc. (I know that you stick some version of seed into localstorage, but the security overall feels quite wonky)
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ch0k1 8 Mar
It seems a lot needs to be clarified...
reply
31 sats \ 1 reply \ @freetx 8 Mar
Its a nice idea, but I would 2nd what nout said. Recommendations:
-
First make sure that user understands they need to onboard BTC before "minting" (ie. Mint button should be disabled if no available funds).
-
Provide some way for users to backup / restore their seed phrase
-
Until the wallet can send / receive these assets, whats the point? I mean I can create some assets but they must just stay in my wallet?
reply
55 sats \ 0 replies \ @ch0k1 8 Mar
Your recommendations seem a must-haves 🤔
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 8 Mar
Wow interesting it works on mobile! I’m shocked
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @SaToSHiWoMaN 8 Mar outlawed
stackers have outlawed this. turn on wild west mode in your /settings to see outlawed content.
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @SaToSHiWoMaN 8 Mar outlawed
stackers have outlawed this. turn on wild west mode in your /settings to see outlawed content.
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @IanMalcolmPhd 14 Mar freebie
deleted by author