Yes, on the one hand they are on their way if they keep an open mind, on the other hand they are morons if they're even real and not just trolling shitcoiners and/or people arguing with themselves.

I'd disagree with 'non-reversibility is bad'? Did you mistype? I assume you mean having a central authority who can reverse transactions like VISA or Vitalik? Is no good. Unless aware parties contract in a specific context to allow 3rd party escrow, insurance, or guarantee, it is best that accountability be based on the agreement between them... but I can imagine a scenario in which bitcoin reigns and there are custodial options that guarantee purchases on a non-trustless network. Say Walmart runs a 2nd layer where you can use the full faith and credit of your reputation in combination with the full faith and credit of theirs to make a vehicle purchase that can be returned on certain terms.

And I would also disagree with the point of money is to be spent and not hodl'd in many contexts. The point of money is to facilitate trade. You have apple I have orange, I don't want apple, but you want orange. Give me dollar instead, everyone has dollar. Saving in a sane economy is good - and good money (non-fiat) doesn't punish that. TLDR Hoarding is a negative connotation created to bring silver to FDR, essential