reply on: SN release: million sat madness, reward leaderboard, top stackers by value, more \ stacker news ~meta

534 sats \ 8 replies \ @k00b OP 1 Mar \ on: SN release: million sat madness, reward leaderboard, top stackers by value, more meta

Oh and rankings in the leaderboard are recomputed hourly.

641 sats \ 7 replies \ @k00b OP 1 Mar

If you're wondering why you're not on the leaderboard, it's because 50% of a stacker's value depends on how well they zap posts/comments as it always has been. If you don't zap well, early, often and meaningfully, your posts/comments will need to be 2x better (roughly) than others in the leaderboard who are zapping.

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @Fabs 1 Mar

That's dope, but does it reset one's "value" hour-by-hour, picking up again from the place one ended the last hour on, thus actually enabling to win or lose places by merely "out-zapping" someone who earned more Sats, which could be reversed the following hour, or how does the "value" work?

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b OP 1 Mar

It doesn't reset value. It looks at a time period's best posts and comments and their zappers, and from that determines value.

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Fabs 1 Mar

And that value gets added each time, resulting in one's placement?

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b OP 1 Mar

Yes it isn't their latest value. It's their cumulative value over the time period. For MSM it's the cumulative value over the calendar month.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fabs 1 Mar

That's a dope system, it's not about what you stack, but how you act.

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined 1 Mar

meaningfully

Meaning content valued by other stackers?

I guess I need to revise my montra again: "Zap big. Zap often. Zap early. Zap meaningfully." That's getting cumbersome.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 1 Mar

By meaningfully I meant 'big' but your mantra does not account for zapping 'well' which is meant to mean zapping the good stuff you suspect we'll all like.