SN release: million sat madness, reward leaderboard, top stackers by value, more \ stacker news ~meta

SN release: million sat madness, reward leaderboard, top stackers by value, more

4928 sats \ 59 comments \ @k00b 1 Mar meta

Million Sat Madness is live! We repurposed the rewards page for it. It has a leaderboard with estimated payouts.

Other related updates:

you can now sort stackers by value in top, e.g. https://stacker.news/top/stackers/week
- this allows you to see who has been most rewardable historically according to our latest rewards algorithm
stackers who hide themselves from top now get a placeholder in rankings so people can really see how they're stacking up

view all related items

392 sats \ 9 replies \ @Undisciplined 1 Mar

I love it!

I like the way you handled all those sneaking sneakers. Careful y'all, the snooker can become the snorked.

31 sats \ 5 replies \ @Natalia 1 Mar

imagine when team @sn do that to the cowboy page... 🕵🏼

121 sats \ 4 replies \ @k00b OP 1 Mar

We did do it to the cowboys page: https://stacker.news/top/cowboys :)

121 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined 1 Mar

Fuck you! I used to be top 10.

31 sats \ 0 replies \ @Cowboy 1 Mar

😂

31 sats \ 0 replies \ @Natalia 1 Mar

I like the way you handled all those sneaking sneakers 😂

and now @Undisciplined got mad 😂

31 sats \ 0 replies \ @Natalia 1 Mar

😂😂😂 madness.

31 sats \ 2 replies \ @carlosfandango 1 Mar

Worthy having a quick peek if you are the sneaky sort… let’s see who it catches out (just for fun really)

20 sats \ 1 reply \ @Natalia 1 Mar

I'd have a quick peek when less people around 🤓

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @carlosfandango 1 Mar

I did. Think I got away with it… position 64 woohoo!

534 sats \ 8 replies \ @k00b OP 1 Mar

Oh and rankings in the leaderboard are recomputed hourly.

641 sats \ 7 replies \ @k00b OP 1 Mar

If you're wondering why you're not on the leaderboard, it's because 50% of a stacker's value depends on how well they zap posts/comments as it always has been. If you don't zap well, early, often and meaningfully, your posts/comments will need to be 2x better (roughly) than others in the leaderboard who are zapping.

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @Fabs 1 Mar

That's dope, but does it reset one's "value" hour-by-hour, picking up again from the place one ended the last hour on, thus actually enabling to win or lose places by merely "out-zapping" someone who earned more Sats, which could be reversed the following hour, or how does the "value" work?

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b OP 1 Mar

It doesn't reset value. It looks at a time period's best posts and comments and their zappers, and from that determines value.

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Fabs 1 Mar

And that value gets added each time, resulting in one's placement?

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b OP 1 Mar

Yes it isn't their latest value. It's their cumulative value over the time period. For MSM it's the cumulative value over the calendar month.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fabs 1 Mar

That's a dope system, it's not about what you stack, but how you act.

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined 1 Mar

meaningfully

Meaning content valued by other stackers?

I guess I need to revise my montra again: "Zap big. Zap often. Zap early. Zap meaningfully." That's getting cumbersome.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 1 Mar

By meaningfully I meant 'big' but your mantra does not account for zapping 'well' which is meant to mean zapping the good stuff you suspect we'll all like.

221 sats \ 3 replies \ @sn 1 Mar

One additional note, all SN-affiliated accounts (@k00b, @kr, @ek, @sn) have been disqualified from participating in Million Sat Madness.

Yeehaw! 🤠

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @siggy47 1 Mar

So the rewards are not issued for them? Where do they go? How do you exclude the accounts and calculate it?

76 sats \ 0 replies \ @sn 1 Mar

correct, the SN-affiliated accounts are disqualified from participating. any rewards that would have otherwise gone to those accounts just gets added to the pool of bonus sats for Million Sat Madness

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Natalia 1 Mar

Yeehaw!

sorry not sorry, will zap @ek more then 👀

129 sats \ 3 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 1 Mar

What setting do we need to enable to appear in the ranking?

16 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b OP 1 Mar

hide from top stackers

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @0xbitcoiner 1 Mar

I'm just thinking out loud, but maybe there should be a separate setting for MSM.

16 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 1 Mar

I thought about it but it leaks all the data people are saying they want to hide when setting hide from top stackers.

129 sats \ 1 reply \ @hasherstacker 1 Mar

Well planned and organized. This is interesting, how you put it. I don't think the ranking only applies to March.

175 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 1 Mar

The leaderboard on the rewards page does only apply to march. It's consistent with historical value ranking because the people in the leaderboard are consistently providing high value including within the last 12 hours.

121 sats \ 10 replies \ @Natalia 1 Mar

"stacker is in hiding" 😂 - possible to add the anon hat? way cooler!

and how the percentage being calculated?

90 sats \ 9 replies \ @k00b OP 1 Mar

@kr came up with a static distribution. I'm not sure how he came up with it though.

92 sats \ 8 replies \ @kr 1 Mar

175 sats \ 6 replies \ @Natalia 1 Mar

is it a secret formula? 😂

cc coders to dig it up @0xbitcoiner

43 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 3 Mar

It seems like it's not a secret after all. What a pity, I thought I was going to have a good puzzle on my hands.

247 sats \ 4 replies \ @k00b OP 1 Mar

secret formula proportions
0.3312903760145768
0.09938711280437303
0.06625807520291535
0.04969355640218651
0.033129037601457675
0.02981613384131191
0.026503230081166142
0.023190326321020374
0.019877422560874606
0.016564518800728838
0.014908066920655955
0.013251615040583071
0.012920324664568494
0.012589034288553918
0.01225774391253934
0.011926453536524764
0.011595163160510187
0.01126387278449561
0.010932582408481033
0.010601292032466457
0.01027000165645188
0.009938711280437303
0.009607420904422726
0.00927613052840815
0.008944840152393572
0.008613549776378996
0.008282259400364419
0.007950969024349842
0.007619678648335266
0.007288388272320689
0.006957097896306112
0.006625807520291536
0.006294517144276959
0.005963226768262382
0.005631936392247805
0.005300646016233228
0.0049693556402186515
0.004638065264204075
0.004306774888189498
0.003975484512174921
0.0036441941361603446
0.003312903760145768
0.0031472585721384794
0.002981613384131191
0.0028159681961239026
0.002650323008116614
0.0024846778201093257
0.0023190326321020373
0.002153387444094749
0.0019877422560874605
0.0018220970680801723
0.001656451880072884
0.0014908066920655955
0.001325161504058307
0.0011595163160510187
0.0009938711280437303
0.000828225940036442
0.0006625807520291535
0.0004969355640218651
0.00033129037601457677
0.00033129037601457677
0.00033129037601457677
0.00033129037601457677
0.00033129037601457677

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 3 Mar

What are the odds? The total comes out to exactly 100%! :)

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @danieltapa 1 Mar

ChatGPT got it!

"It seems like the values are decreasing and getting closer to zero. Additionally, the values are following a certain pattern where each subsequent value is approximately one-third of the previous value.

This suggests an exponential decay pattern. Specifically, it seems the values are being generated by the function:

f(n)=1/(3ˆn)

where n represents the position in the sequence (starting from 0)."

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Natalia 1 Mar

now I'm curious how these random number comes from and why the bottom are the same - did you get lazy and just put the same number 😂 @kr

100 sats \ 0 replies \ @kr 1 Mar

those are the digits of my social security number 🙊

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 2 Mar

😂

31 sats \ 0 replies \ @TheWildHustle 1 Mar

Keep up the great work!

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @cryotosensei 1 Mar

That’s great. Now I know where I truly stand ~ on the shoulders of giants or chasing after their shadows haha

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @carlosfandango 1 Mar

That’s very cool. Well done!

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @gd 1 Mar

This is cool, and also humbling

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @03d99caedc 1 Mar

Way to really indicate the “return of the stack” yes you did. Yes you did.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @UCantDoThatDotRugged 1 Mar

Looks like someone's already raining 1 sat per new post to game this :D I'm curious how it will work out. Lots of experimentation is good, and glad there's transparency.

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Proofofwork 1 Mar

What about daily rewards?

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 1 Mar

They are gone for the month

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Cowboy 1 Mar

I am not in the list, IDK how it works!

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @jakoyoh629 1 Mar

This is crazy. I was kicked out of the race because I don't have much time. What's the incentive to ZAP when you already know you're going to be left out? All that's left is to post good content.