pull down to refresh
533 sats \ 4 replies \ @joda 9 Feb \ on: What does it mean for SN to flourish? meta
I like it because there is a diversity of interests but a common core. There are enough new members and enough creativity to keep it peppy, but it's not like Reddit (very young, naive, posting redundant questions every day) or Nostr (so much meme noise that the signal is totally drowned out).
It's also pretty respectful in a way, like armed forces service members. They might knock on one branch or the other, but it's with respect. Here you get both sides of the political aisle (with a heavy dose of "both sides are crooks") but with enough respect and intelligence to see that all issues are more complicated than they seem at face value.
In short, there's a guy trying to make his local government better, talking to a dude eating out of a can in his bunker.
That said, we could use a little more feminine perspective around here. Not that it comes across as sexist; just "male-dominated".
I think ironically the only thing that would stop SN from "flourishing" is to try too hard to be something else, or to be too many things. There are several cool forums that predate all "social media" (or the internet proper, for that matter).
That said, we could use a little more feminine perspective around here. Not that it comes across as sexist; just "male-dominated".
Agreed, and I'll raise you: would love to see more diversity of all kinds -- by which I mean, diversity of perspectives and viewpoints and experiences. Those correlate with the kinds of diversity markers that are easy to measure, but are not identical to them.
I understand why some orgs fixate on the "obvious" marks of diversity, but that's missing the point, imo.
reply
Bitcoin like STEM is male dominated.
92 percent of airline pilots are male
I’ve never met a female plumber or handyman
reply
This is one of the things I think it's very hard to discuss sanely. I suppose because to be sane you have to hold two things in your mind that pull in opposite directions.
I think that there are a handful of core differences between men and women that reliably express themselves in the type of professions they tend to pursue, and it's delusional to pretend otherwise.
I also think it's delusional to deny that massively skewed distributions are often really good indicators that something pathological is going on with the pipeline.
As a general rule of thumb, a hell of a lot of stuff turns out to be class #2 that you initially think is class #1, e.g., once upon a time there were zero MMA fighters. Now there are many. But it's still skewed, and I don't think that's a problem.
reply
Is something pathological happening with airlines pilots and plumbers?
reply