pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 4 Feb \ parent \ on: Stacker Saloon
As @ekzyis would say, private but not secure.
haha, indeed :)
I think I read somewhere that good concealment is preferred over good cover but not sure. Couldn't find the source. Maybe someone with more military experience can chime in? šŸ‘€
I found this nice chart here though:
https://m.stacker.news/14827
write
preview
374 sats \ 2 replies \ @Natalia 4 Feb
good concealment is preferred over good cover
maybe that's why
  • the real rich never wear fancy brands?
  • the real good restaurant often hidden on street corners?
  • the good men is not in social media posting selfies?
  • the real travelers don't post their travel photos?
šŸ‘€
reply
69 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 4 Feb
I mean to me, it sounds quite obvious. If given the choice between not being a target at all and being a well-defended target, I would pick 'not a target at all' every time.
It's not that easy though. I guess there is a sweet spot of concealment and cover. Having no cover at all is probably pretty stressful; negating the effects of your concealment.
maybe that's why
  • the real rich never wear fancy brands?
  • the real good restaurant often hidden on street corners?
  • the good men is not in social media posting selfies?
I also think this is related to which groups you target. So it's not only about making yourself not a target but also what is your target. Some things act as filters :)
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Natalia 4 Feb
I would pick 'not a target at all' every time.
same, leave me alone!
I guess there is a sweet spot of concealment and cover. Having no cover at all is probably pretty stressful; negating the effects of your concealment.
šŸ¤”
Some things act as filters :)
many fun things can talk about in the ~security.
reply