![7636.jpg](https://m.stacker.news/14625)

0xbitcoiner

Interesting thought. I'd felt putting posting fees above 100 might be too steep. But other territories are working successfully at 500+ thats really helpful information.

Public_N_M_E

I do tend to zap every post that anyone makes. My default zap is set to 69 ;) and the post fees is set to 21 so normally (unless they've done multiple inside of 10mins) that poster is making profit on the post immediately.

crypto

, every post that you don't zap for reasons has a higher impact on their wallet.

Not saying you should raise your fees (since it's also a liquidity problem on your side to have enough to refund the good content); just that there is a difference between 21 sats and 512 sats.

I even raised fees to 1024 sats at one point but quickly realized that's quite high. That's when stackers like 

 started to ask me in advance if I would refund their posts, lol. That was definitely interesting to see.

Music

Daily Discussion Thread ~Music Saloon

> I do tend to zap every post that anyone makes. My default zap is set to 69 ;) and the post fees is set to 21 so normally (unless they've done multiple inside of 10mins) that poster is making profit on the post immediately.

Yeah, but if fees are 512 sats like in ~crypto, every post that you don't zap for reasons has a higher impact on their wallet.

Not saying you should raise your fees (since it's also a liquidity problem on your side to have enough to refund the good content); just that there is a difference between 21 sats and 512 sats.

I even raised fees to 1024 sats at one point but quickly realized that's quite high. That's when stackers like @0xbitcoiner started to ask me in advance if I would refund their posts, lol. That was definitely interesting to see.