I think the only thing to add is differentiating the difference of bitcoin and "crypto"

Bitcoin is really the only true digital bearer property in the sense that you have the same property rights whether you hold 1,000 sats or 1,000 btc. More stake does not equal more control therefore it aligns similar to holding a bar of gold or a barrel of oil.

Crypto operates on a scale of "buidling" utility or an outright scam / gambling speculation. One of the main differences between bitcoin and crypto is how tokens were issued. For 99.9% of crypto the token issuance looks a lot like an equity issuance. In proof of stake you are a limited partner to the general partner and have minimal control. Proof of stake is very much like owning a share in a company and relying on the execution and governance of "whales" and "developers". This isn't to say its morally wrong to "buidl" and do an ICO however when a project markets their token to have the same qualities as bitcoin and be decentralized property they are either naiive or morally corrupt. Crypto are unregulated stocks with no legal recourse or fair disclosures. Venture capital liquidity before product market fit.
ICO = IPO or share issuance Vote by stake = Shareholder votes Stake reward = dividend payouts or share issuance dilution

In conclusion the main difference between bitcoin and crypto:

Bitcoin: you are the general partner to your property

Crypto: you are a limited partner relying on whales and developers for your investment