pull down to refresh

Tired of clueless pundits and friends dredging up the same old talking points about why crypto is all a scam? Pull out this document.
They're back. As the crypto bear market worsens, the haters are coming out of the woodwork again to sneer at an industry they've long insisted was nothing more than an overhyped scam.
Veteran crypto users have seen this movie before. It happened in 2010, 2014, 2018, and it's happening right now: Media pundits and casual observers—many of whom know nothing about crypto—are trotting out the same tired talking points to say that they've been right all along.
Tweet by Nouriel Roubini @Nourie With BTC down almost 80% from peak (from 20K to ~4K) & all other cryptocurrencies down 80% to 99% I rest my case that this crypto bubble went bust for good. I feel vindicated. So I will take a break for a few days from this toxic Crypto Twitter. Waste of time to convince zealots 1:58 AM · Nov 21, 2018
"Crypto is one big Ponzi scheme. Tokens go up only when there are enough suckers to buy more of them."
Rebuttal: Are some token projects and shitcoins Ponzi-like scams? Absolutely. But you can say the same thing about many thinly traded stocks and other high-risk investments. In the decade-plus price history of Bitcoin and other top tokens like Ethereum and XRP, their value has never gone to zero—which is what happens in a Ponzi scheme. Instead, each has recovered from multiple bear cycles to surpass previous highs.
"Crypto has no intrinsic value. Unlike fiat, crypto isn’t backed by anything."
Rebuttal: Since the dollar went off the gold standard in 1971, the dollar isn't backed by anything either. Bitcoin has value because of the uses of the technology behind it. And legitimate crypto projects are backed by large and growing online communities whose wealth and influence now exceeds those of some small countries.
"Crypto isn't safe. People keep getting hacked."
Rebuttal: Hacks happen when people fall victim to phishing scams and give access to their wallet, just like similar scams in tradfi, outside of crypto. Novices and crypto newcomers who use safe platforms such as Coinbase or Gemini or FTX haven't lost a penny to fraud.
"Bitcoin was invented in 2008 and has failed to take off."
Rebuttal: The internet was invented in 1969, and the first consumer web boom—the one that preceded the dotcom crash—didn’t happen until the mid-1990s. By 1995, there were only 40 million people on the Internet. Bitcoin already has over 100 million users worldwide. The widespread use of mobile web, apps, social media, and e-commerce (what crypto people refer to as Web2) didn’t truly happen until the creation of the iPhone in 2007. That's 18 years into the web. Bitcoin is only 13 years old.
"Crypto is for criminals"
Rebuttal: The same is true of $100 bills or gift cards, both of which are popular with drug cartels. While Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have become a favorite payment method for certain types of crime, particularly ransomware, the number of criminal transactions as a proportion of overall crypto activity is relatively small and shrinking every year. Moreover, law enforcement has recently done on multiple occasions what was once thought impossible: tracked down and recovered stolen crypto.
"Blockchains aren't good for anything."
Rebuttal: Blockchain applications are useful whenever something can be improved or made more efficient through decentralization, such as the ancient software banks use—which is why even banks are testing blockchains. Distributed ledger technology has already become an integral part of the tech stack.
"I still can’t buy my cup of coffee with Bitcoin."
Rebuttal: It's true that Bitcoin hasn't caught on as an everyday payment mechanism. The currency is still volatile, and even small crypto payments—including for a cup of coffee—can trigger tax obligations. Bitcoin and crypto payments are still not ready for prime time. But blockchain technology is evolving rapidly and there have already been major breakthroughs on the payment front in the form of non-volatile stablecoins such as USDC, Lighting, and other payment rails built atop blockchains, and pending bills in Congress propose tax exemption for crypto transactions under $200.
"Crypto is killing the planet"
Rebuttal: Bitcoin's energy-intensive design is not representative of the vast majority of blockchains, which employ a technology called "proof-of-stake" with an exponentially lighter environmental footprint. Ethereum's migration to proof-of-stake will be complete by the fall. And Bitcoin miners are increasingly acknowledging the need to shift away from fossil fuel-based energy to solar or other forms of clean power.
"Web3 is clunky and too hard to use" Rebuttal: Compared to familiar apps like Instagram or PayPal, prominent Web3 services like OpenSea or MetaMask can feel janky or exasperatingly complicated. As for gaming—a field where Web3 has the potential to be a natural fit—the most prominent crypto initiatives (such as Axie Infinity) are simplistic affairs that prioritize hawking tokens over fun. So Web3 isn't pretty or easy yet, making this the most valid lingering criticism. But the good news is everyone in crypto knows it. Web3 builders correctly point out that the top priority for the industry has been backend infrastructure rather than user experience. Now that the infrastructure is in place, this is changing and new tools are focused on terrific UX. When the next crypto boom arrives, Web3 design will likely have already made a giant leap forward.
Source: decrypt.co
Bitcoin is not an energy producer, it is a consumer. The ESG FUD makes zero sense. So a Tesla car literally powered by coal and natural gas = good, Bitcoin = bad. Sounds like maybe the energy providers should be their target.
reply
I think the only thing to add is differentiating the difference of bitcoin and "crypto"
Bitcoin is really the only true digital bearer property in the sense that you have the same property rights whether you hold 1,000 sats or 1,000 btc. More stake does not equal more control therefore it aligns similar to holding a bar of gold or a barrel of oil.
Crypto operates on a scale of "buidling" utility or an outright scam / gambling speculation. One of the main differences between bitcoin and crypto is how tokens were issued. For 99.9% of crypto the token issuance looks a lot like an equity issuance. In proof of stake you are a limited partner to the general partner and have minimal control. Proof of stake is very much like owning a share in a company and relying on the execution and governance of "whales" and "developers". This isn't to say its morally wrong to "buidl" and do an ICO however when a project markets their token to have the same qualities as bitcoin and be decentralized property they are either naiive or morally corrupt. Crypto are unregulated stocks with no legal recourse or fair disclosures. Venture capital liquidity before product market fit.
ICO = IPO or share issuance Vote by stake = Shareholder votes Stake reward = dividend payouts or share issuance dilution
In conclusion the main difference between bitcoin and crypto:
Bitcoin: you are the general partner to your property
Crypto: you are a limited partner relying on whales and developers for your investment
Thank you for sharing.
Thx for sharing…
Good article. Needed during these down times no doubt.