Would it make sense and are the SN team thinking about this at all? Just curious...
pull down to refresh
46 sats \ 0 replies \ @freetx 18 Jan
Fedimints / eCash are very interesting and are great tools. Particularly great for onboarding and for payment networks connecting various vendors as it improves the privacy significantly over a SQL database from a single custodian.
However, the biggest area of concern is potential for Fractional Reserve debasement (see: https://fedimint.org/docs/TradeOffs/DebasementRisk) (Note this exist as well in SQL database scenario, so no increase of threat there)
While the BTC held can't be debased, the eCash issued can be. There are strategies that could mitigate that, like software clients that perform coordinated bank runs in an automated fashion, etc.
However, there are also conceptual approaches that you can use to protect yourself: namely, sizing your exposure.
Often in these discussions we take a "one size fits all" approach and ignore the reality that any transaction - of any sort - have counterparty risks (ie. you bought a book from a vendor and they don't ship your book).
Consider the following allocation:
- eCash: $25
- LN: $1000
- BTC: $50,000
At any time you can swap more LN for eCash (if you needed to make a bigger purchase)...or vice versa you could cashout of eCash totally if you have no pressing need to make purchases.
Likewise as you build-up LN reserves, you could periodically move to BTC as fees permit.
In effect, eCash should be used only as a transactional coin and shouldn't really be held for any significant length of time.
Fedimints / eCash are a solution layer that handles the "last mile" problem (onboarding and payment networks).
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @netstatic 18 Jan
I don’t think it would make much sense for stackernews since I trust this website alone more than I trust a federation of random Bitcoin influencers, which are probably going to be the first people willing to be federation member.
I would be open to Cashu for single party mints but not having a platform custody my balance (I would have to use my device as a wallet) would add a lot of friction as I move between devices. Even if my wallet had a system where it asked me for approval before a spend, the frequency of my upvotes on stackernews would make the task tiring. I guess that’s more a wallet problem than a cashu problem.
Maybe I’d be willing to adopt this model as a user if the wallet app let me auto-approve ecash requests from stackernews up to a preset daily amount?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @030a29f333 OP 18 Jan
Perhaps you're right, cashu may be a better fit. Really just looking for any upgrade over the traditional custodial LN model
reply