but if you notice you'll be giving 3 points to a stacker for a post that might be shit.
Wdym with this? It wasn't me and 3 - 384 is still net negative.
3 - 1000 is more net negative though.
maybe I should have waited until your edit timer ran out.
wouldn't it be better, as moderator, to delete the post?
reply
No, why?
I don't mind if people value this stuff enough.
But I don't value it and I am the one who has to pay the rent for this territory. So if you want to post stuff I didn't create the territory for, fine, but you'll financially support me then at least.
If I simply outlaw it (there are no deletes), I would lose the signal in recent that maybe you should reconsider posting crypto news since you're probably just wasting your sats.
reply
good point
reply
16 sats \ 5 replies \ @ek 16 Jan
Sats are the signal
Or in this case no sats
reply
What would you do if I posted the following paper related to IOHK and the Ethereum Foundation?
reply
lol I understand this meme now:
But joke aside. Before I answer your question, let me ask you a question:
What do you think I would do?
[0] which I hope won't be a bad precedent and invite more stackers to ask the same question before posting in ~crypto
reply
pay the cost 1000 + 10% ? :)
reply
If your link post form looks like this
your answer might indeed be correct :)
disclaimer: I don't have enough sats in my wallet to refund you in full right now lol. will do it tomorrow after I received my rewards.