64 sats \ 9 replies \ @ek 16 Jan \ parent \ on: Stacker Saloon
Wdym with this? It wasn't me and 3 - 384 is still net negative.
3 - 1000 is more net negative though.
maybe I should have waited until your edit timer ran out.
wouldn't it be better, as moderator, to delete the post?
reply
No, why?
I don't mind if people value this stuff enough.
But I don't value it and I am the one who has to pay the rent for this territory. So if you want to post stuff I didn't create the territory for, fine, but you'll financially support me then at least.
If I simply outlaw it (there are no deletes), I would lose the signal in recent that maybe you should reconsider posting crypto news since you're probably just wasting your sats.
reply
good point
reply
reply
What would you do if I posted the following paper related to IOHK and the Ethereum Foundation?
reply
lol I understand this meme now:
But joke aside. Before I answer your question, let me ask you a question:
What do you think I would do?
[0] which I hope won't be a bad precedent and invite more stackers to ask the same question before posting in ~crypto
reply
pay the cost
1000 + 10% ? :)
reply
If your link post form looks like this
your answer might indeed be correct :)
disclaimer: I don't have enough sats in my wallet to refund you in full right now lol. will do it tomorrow after I received my rewards.