276 sats \ 9 replies \ @Murch 16 Jan \ on: Opinion: Spam can't cause high fees - Thriller post bitcoin
Your article is on-point. Clearly, people creating inscriptions are making money in some fashion, since they are paying dozens of bitcoins in fees per day. Let’s hope that said market quickly discovers that BRC20 tokens are worthless, the other inscriptions don’t seem to be nearly as prevalent.
"Clearly, people creating inscriptions are making money in some fashion" <-- Not necessarily. They could be... let's say... getting paid to sabotage bitcoin,
reply
reply
Point taken.
reply
Why is it always an attack?
Why would anyone spend money into attacking something everybody knows that isn't going anywhere?
Why when this congestion happens in other networks it's just speculation, stupidity and inefficiency, but when it happens in Bitcoin is "a nation-state attack"?
I don't what I find more retarded, the cryptobro syndrome that plagues the network today or the or conspiracy theorist syndrome that plagues most Bitcoiners.
Get you head out of your own ass, this is not an attack and if it were it will go nowhere, Bitcoin is too strong and people are too stupid.
reply
It's an attack because it's an attack.
If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry.
reply
Give me hard proof other than the loose end correlations people are giving on Twitter as "proof".
This is not an attack, this is what we advocated for when we all decided that small blocks, Segwit and Lightning were the solution. It's just not the use case we wanted for Bitcoin.
reply
Nope.