pull down to refresh
10 sats \ 23 replies \ @siggy47 OP 17 Dec 2023 freebie \ parent \ on: How private are the messages in a LN transaction? bitcoin_beginners
I'm glad you brought that up. I get messages and honestly I often have more than 250k in my wallet, or am I mistaken. Also, would sending to a lightning address be considered creating an invoice? Thanks for the reply. That error message confused me.
Wow, had no idea. I'm currently at 251k and didn't realize I have stopped receiving zaps. Something should be stated to help educate this. A warning icon or something would be great.
reply
Zaps on sn aren’t stopped. Just invoices adding external sats
reply
that's a big deal for people using SN as an LNURL address on nostr.
reply
I think a banner saying something like this:
Your wallet is over the limit, you will not be able to deposit any more sats (or receive zaps from outside of SN). Please withdraw your sats.
when their wallet is over the limit might make sense that a user can click away when they've seen it?
/cc @k00b
Sending to a lightning address does generate an invoice under the hood.
reply
Thanks for the info. So stackers here need to keep balances below 250k to message others?
reply
It appears so.
reply
To receive messages, I think? Though I didn’t think the limit was that low. It’s been a minute since I’ve been in the code though
reply
Maybe that low limit is new, because I'm pretty sure I've messaged with a wallet balance more than 250k?
reply
I think it’s the recipients balance that matters, not the senders balance. But in any case, if you’ve had a message exchange back and forth while maintaining a balance over 250K, that would suggest the limit was higher.
reply
If it was the sender's balance, it wouldn't be a vulnerability. The ability to find out yourself you have > 250k sats is a well-known feature :)
reply
For sure. The way siggy phrased one of his comments made me want to be painfully explicit lol
reply
Earlier today was the first time I saw that error message. It just seems really low.
reply
Correct. It is the receiver
reply
The limit has changed fairly recently I think.
reply
It was you address I used.
reply
I thought so. Were you aware of the 250k limit? I guess I never got the memo.
reply
I was. Hit it the other day.
reply
deleted by author
reply
deleted by author
reply