pull down to refresh

265 sats \ 4 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 17 Dec 2023 \ parent \ on: How private are the messages in a LN transaction? bitcoin_beginners
I think it’s the recipients balance that matters, not the senders balance. But in any case, if you’ve had a message exchange back and forth while maintaining a balance over 250K, that would suggest the limit was higher.
write
preview
335 sats \ 1 reply \ @SpaceHodler 17 Dec 2023
If it was the sender's balance, it wouldn't be a vulnerability. The ability to find out yourself you have > 250k sats is a well-known feature :)
reply
2 sats \ 0 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 17 Dec 2023
For sure. The way siggy phrased one of his comments made me want to be painfully explicit lol
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 OP 17 Dec 2023
Earlier today was the first time I saw that error message. It just seems really low.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 17 Dec 2023
Correct. It is the receiver
reply