The mistake mentioned is related to the 4 years halvings, he says it "shocks" the market, and a better way would be to decrease block rewards ever so slightly with every new block mined.
Thoughts?
reply
Necessity is the mother of innovation
Everyone gets bitcoin at the exchange rate they deserve. I don't use the word "price" because most who adopt bitcoin will not pay fiat for it. They will have their wealth wiped out and will need to earn it. I see no mistake at all.
reply
To me, the following reads like the writer is saying the entire supply is halved, and as a result we have volatility.
This choice of supply schedule has consequences. Because the supply is suddenly reduced by 50% overnight, it shocks the market. As demand remains unchanged, the price adjusts upward, as Bitcoin is now twice as scarce. The rapid price surge leads to a hype cycle, drawing media attention, attracting new adopters.
Is that intentionally misleading language to bolster their criticism? Am I overthinking this? Are readers to know he means new additional supply?
reply