pull down to refresh
428 sats \ 4 replies \ @grayruby OP 6 Dec 2023 \ parent \ on: Stacker Sports- Day 2 Stacker_Sports
Great.
Now that we are in our corner of the world. I am going to admit I was pretty annoyed to see jeff had founded the econ sub and responded by saying your posts inspired him to start it. You brought that to finish line, not him. Honestly, my first inclination was let's fork it, call it macro, with you as the founder and jeff can talk to himself in econ. I can be a bit petty at times.
I was playing in the snow with my daughter when it all rolled out and Siggy was worried someone was going to snag Sports before me. I would have just created stacker_sports anyways (not a fan of the underscore but I wasn't allowed to use a space).
Anyways, I don't know jeff, I see he was an OG stacker but went away for awhile and just came back recently. Hopefully it all works out but I just want to commend you for what you did getting the meta econ going. Your posts were getting good engagement.
I appreciate it, but if someone else wants to pony up the 100k per month that's fine with me. I'm sure we'll continue having good econ talks over there. He may have been the one who offered a large bounty for the creation of an econ sub. That was the same day I started the meta takeover posts and I said then that I didn't care who got management of the sub upon our victory.
reply
Who knows how this is going to play out anyways. I expect the great sub attrition to occur once people realize they are paying 100k sats and earning only a few k sats back from sub revenue. It will take a lot of time, effort and attracting many more users to the site/sub to ever reach break even.
reply
I was wondering about that. What does the value proposition look like after half a day?
reply
Well I earned 6k sats yesterday but only 120 from the sub. Haha.
reply