102 sats \ 4 replies \ @ek 6 Dec 2023 freebie \ parent \ on: Stacker Saloon
this is actually a very interesting topic. it's not limited to "crypto" and "cryptocurrencies" vs "cryptography"
it's also relevant in other areas of life like how should you call some groups of people:
Should you use the term they used to use for themselves? Or should you give them a new term? Should we stop using the term the colonists gave them because they were meant in a derogatory way even though they might use the term for themselves now? Is calling "Indians" "Indians" (native american) racist because Columbus thought he arrived in India but actually landed in America? Should we stop using the original term since we don't belong to the group so we don't have the "right" to use the original term? And then even start to tell them even they themselves can't use their own original word ... and so on ...
if you want to do some research, read up the "controversy" around the term "Eskimo". For example:
-- https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2016/04/24/475129558/why-you-probably-shouldnt-say-eskimo
Should you use the term they used to use for themselves? Or should you give them a new term?
The terms "chain", "blocks", "chain of blocks", "proof-of-work chain", "timestamp server" and "timechain" are all mentioned in the whitepaper and code. As far as I know, the term "blockchain" was never explicitly mentioned. I'm not even sure why or when people started calling it that. So, I don't really mind if shitcoiners have that term for themselfs.
Personally, I don't feel the need to come up with new terms or enforce them on shitcoiners.
They can have "crypto", and I'll stick with "Bitcoin".
They can have "blockchain," and I'll go with "timechain", "timestamp server" which are the correct terms mentioned by satoshi.
There's no need to change anything imo.
reply
deleted by author
reply
deleted by author
reply
haha same
but maybe interacting with stackers on SN can be considered part of my work? :)
but definitely need to find the right balance ...
reply