0 sats \ 5 replies \ @Bitman 5 Dec 2023 \ parent \ on: Territories and The "Home" Sub meta
We all know that Meta grew become a catch-all sub almost as soon as it started.
Now it's reverted back to it's ¿intended? use - to talk about Stacker News, people post for 100 sats?
This territory, for this reason, is really important. Can you talk us through your reasoning on this?
write
preview
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @k00b 5 Dec 2023
The reasoning of which part?
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Bitman 5 Dec 2023
The 'higher fee to post in Meta' part.
reply
10 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b 5 Dec 2023
Because it isn't intended to be a catchall and no longer needs to be a catchall. Someone can create a ~misc or ~catchall territory if they want.
The fee isn't crazy right? It's just enough to make you consider if a post should go somewhere else instead. If you report a bug or have a solid feature request in ~meta, you'll usually recoup the post fee and more.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Bitman 5 Dec 2023
So, it's to try and keep it for it's intended purpose?
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 5 Dec 2023
Yes it's an experiment to see if it no longer attracts malinvestment.
reply