Bunch of relevant data on the state of btc in 2024. Not super clear on the details of how they assembled their sample, but interesting nonetheless.
pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @TNStacker 30 Nov 2023
What kind of detail are you looking for beyond what they state in the opening paragraph and the methodology statement before the sources?
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @elvismercury OP 30 Nov 2023
This is enough to drive a truck through. Among the most important things you'd want to know are how they found these people. Did they do a Mechanical Turk solicitation? Did they talk to their clients? Did they contact a list they bought someplace?
The second thing I'd like is a distribution of those ages and other demographic info. It means a quite different thing if these answers come from 90% people under 30, vs a normal distribution w/ mean at 55.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @TNStacker 30 Nov 2023
I guess I assume they matched the age distribution since they had a stated goal of sampling the investor population as they defined.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @elvismercury OP 30 Nov 2023
It would be good not to have to assume.
The point of running a survey like this is to make inferences about the world. Giving basic details about your population, and the methodology you used to select them, is a fundamental part of this. See any social science journal article.
I love Unchained and think Dhruv is a vastly under-rated genius in the btc ecosystem, but this is disappointing.
reply