reply on: @eduardopro's bio \ stacker news ~bitcoin

pull down to refresh

1 sat \ 13 replies \ @DarthCoin 5 Oct 2021 \ on: @eduardopro's bio bitcoin

Bitcoin maximalist that writes for alt-coin-heavy publications.

Are you joking?

You can't be "maximalist" if you work for shitcoiners
there's no such thing as "altcoins" because there's no alternative to Bitcoin. Are only shitcoins.

2 sats \ 1 reply \ @eduardopro OP 6 Oct 2021

I'm an immigrant making a living by writing, sir. Not everyone has the privilege of working for people you're 100% aligned with philosophically.

I'm a maximalist because I think Bitcoin is humanity's only hope and the only thing that matters.

There's no alternative to Bitcoin, I agree.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 6 Oct 2021

have my sat. I hope you understand the difference between "altcoins" and "shitcoins". That's all.

0 sats \ 8 replies \ @abetusk 6 Oct 2021

Can you tone it down? Having this type of toxic, dismissive attitude is really outputting.

We should be welcoming and assume positive intent, not be gatekeepers.

This is the type of comment I would like to downvote.

0 sats \ 7 replies \ @DarthCoin 6 Oct 2021

downvote with your sats if you like But I will continue to be a toxic maximalist

0 sats \ 6 replies \ @abetusk 6 Oct 2021

There is no facility to downvote on this site, using sats or no.

Your comments are precisely why we need downvotes, the ability to flag comments/posts and why we need moderation.

1 sat \ 4 replies \ @eduardopro OP 7 Oct 2021

Don't bring moderation on my account. I can take it. I've been on the Internet a long time Plus, who watches the Watchmen?

I think downvotes would be cool, though. Those would bring another level of complexity to the site.

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @abetusk 7 Oct 2021

If we don'e explicitly bring moderators in, we might end up making folks like @DarthCoin defacto moderators by their toxic behavior.

We're already in that situation with @k00b as our benevolent dictator. Maybe as a compromise there could be some "election" facility for moderators, with people voting on who gets the position via sats and then that's staked for the winner.

Downvotes might get us most of the way there, so maybe that's the first thing to try and bring in more complex solutions as needed.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @eduardopro OP 8 Oct 2021

Personally, I 100% disagree with this approach, I don't need a nanny and the system doesn't need gatekeepers. That's one of the reasons Reddit sucks so hard.

Downvotes, though, I think those would be useful.

reply on another page

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 7 Oct 2021

Who are you to make rules? Who are you to decide to be toxic or not. BTW if you are not toxic you are not bitcoiner. So STFU with your rules and shit. Vote with your sats if you want. That's it. I am sick of all these "smart guys" that want to make their own rules on internet. You don't like it, make your own page.