pull down to refresh

LSPs by definition cannot centralize the lightning network. Centralization is a matter of control. LSPs do not control user funds, the only thing an LSP can do is choose to serve you or not. If they choose not to, just don't use that LSP.
Do not confuse popularity with centralization. They are not the same. A popular service that has no control of your funds or your actions is not a central point of failure even if most people use it. If the most popular LSP in the world begins censoring certain transactions, even that doesn't make it centralized. It is just a signal on the network that there is demand for a new service provider, an uncensored channel to whatever destination the "bad" LSP tried to censor. Anyone can create that connection point easily, so LSPs effectively have no power.
So eventually anyone with excess liquidity will be able to become a LSP?
And LSPs are safe from government regulatory capture?
Thank you for your answer Super_Testnet. I am big fan of your work!
reply
So eventually anyone with excess liquidity will be able to become a LSP?
Yes except the word "eventually" makes it sound like a future reality when it's really a present one. Go be an LSP right now if you want to. It's never been easier. If you feel like there's an obstacle in your path, what is it? I'm happy to help you overcome it.
And LSPs are safe from government regulatory capture?
They can't stop us all
What's nice about being an LSP is, you make money by doing it
The government can't even stop bittorrent and that's just anonymous movie downloads
Imagine them trying to stop anonymous payment routers whose income is on the line
reply
This video of by the creator of ARK is what led to my misunderstanding. Timestamp.
reply
He seems to say in that video that lightning can only scale if LSPs become professional services run by very wealthy people
He's probably right, but (1) we're far from hitting lightning's scalability limits right now, there's plenty of time right now to run an LSP on a hobby node (2) even once that tipping point arrives I still think it's important that anyone be able to run LSP software. Your LSP service might not be popular in a future where professionals dominate the scene, but popularity is not the only important thing in this world.
For me, freedom is key. I don't want to be beholden to professionals. I want to run an LSP locally, for my friends. If that doesn't earn me thousands of dollars per month from massive scale and usage, fine. I'm not asking for that. I just want freedom, and since I can build it myself, I don't really need to ask anyone for that. I'll just do it, and invite others to join me if they want to.
reply
Whats stopping me becoming a LSP?
I don't really have much liquidity on lightning to provide. I just have some sats for nostr which I play around with for fun micropayments.
Thanks again. My misconception was becoming a LSP required a certain level expertise and setting up commercial enterprise almost to be compliant as I saw becoming a LSP as entrepreneurship type venture.
reply
So becoming a LSP is similar to NOSTR. Anyone can run their own relay making it permisionless in that sense.
reply
Yes, you can be an LSP by just running some software -- and it is profitable to do so.
The first time I wrote LSP software was probably Swap Service which lets you do what Boltz Exchange does except you make the money instead of them. More recently, I revised that code and released Zaplocker, which is partly the same thing, but it also has new features e.g. it works for lightning addresses and lets people have a non-custodial one without needing to run a node. (Zeus Pay runs an instance of zaplocker software as well, though Evan rewrote the codebase because my code is bad.)
One of my goals is to make third party intermediaries unnecessary. Another of my goals is to make them as widely available as possible. Those might seem contradictory, but I don't see it that way. Some people want to use third parties for some services, and that's fine, but I'd like that to be an option rather than a need. For those who want third party services, even non-custodial ones like zaplocker come with some risks, such as being deplatformed, but these risks are mitigated if everyone can run a copy of that same third party service. So, making LSP software serves the latter goal: let anyone be an LSP, let a thousand flowers bloom, make it profitable for anyone who wants to give it a try, and that helps LSPs in general evade regulatory capture.
reply