ALL wife wants your money, so yes, it's a shitcoin.
Bitcoin is a perfect defense against that. None of them can take your bitcoins, not even in a divorce.
don't get me wrong. I live with a woman, she's my pair in my life, but we are NOT married, I mean with papers and shit. That doesn't count.
Matter only what you have in your heart.
Wife/husband = contractual commercial partner
Think about that.
So each one with his BTC... but sometimes we use a common wallet, just for common expenses.
I never think I would do weddings, fun to see others sometimes but not too much fun if you are the one who need to put on the show - stack more Bitcoin is better.!
So each one with his BTC... but sometimes we use a common wallet, just for common expenses.
Wow, cool, I always feel like the main reason for many divorces is the money problem; from your experience, does both having his or her bitcoin lead to less arguement, too?
Sometime ago... she said: honey let's buy a new sofa.
Me: what's wrong with the existing one? (was just fine).
Her: I don't like it anymore and the cats let their hair on it.
Me: So? Clean it and will be just fine.
She: But I want a new one.
Me: So? Buy from your sats if you want a new sofa, I don't want and I don't need.
End of story. Now she just love that sofa.
No. I don't think you have to go the traditional religious marriage route if you don't want to but finding a life partner and having kids together is the stuff of what makes a full life. Not for everyone but I think for most.
Please do one for cities because cities are definitely shitcoins.
No they arenβt! Cities are great! This sediment amongst bitcoiners is somewhat ridiculous. Massive amounts of people exchanging ideas/services and customs making life better for all is absolutely fantastic.
I've been pondering this verse and I'm curious what @jimmysong or anyone else thinks about it in the context of this thread:
βFor in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven.β (Matthew 22:30)
I tend to think it suggests more of a @DarthCoin version of marriage described here than the traditional contract-style, but I am also sensitive to @jimmysong's point about no-fault divorce. (In the end, isn't divorce rate more a function of participants' core beliefs than the convenience or legality of it?)
I wrote about this in the new book, but suffice it to say that No-Fault Divorce was one of the biggest blows to the institution of marriage in the last 100 years. And it happened around the Nixon Shock.
Well people tend to treat it like one. Life long commitment by two people to each other is not a scam. For me marriage is holy covenant between my wife and I before God. The fact that others do not value their word, their spouse and deep commitment says more about them and modern society than marriage.
I've also found people are looking for excuses to do things they know are wrong. Reasons why they can do what they want beyond just admitting that is the reason. Rationalizing behavior is real.