2440 sats \ 5 replies \ @birdeye21 6 Sep 2023 \ on: Daily discussion thread
Just had gpt4 pull some cool visuals together for me
Daily discussion threads - comments per day (since May):
https://imgprxy.stacker.news/hLFtubF_EmWj7HWXEmNql-Pvy7oRhssuMUjVhZNZEzg/rs:fit:600:500:0/g:no/aHR0cHM6Ly9pLmltZ3VyLmNvbS9VQ0dxYndWLnBuZw
Cumulative DDT comments (since May):
https://imgprxy.stacker.news/6vBdOKoKbeiP4ZfV11HQFTDB9-cAOVJuJ_2ew_vVNco/rs:fit:600:500:0/g:no/aHR0cHM6Ly9pLmltZ3VyLmNvbS9QTG1OeDlHLnBuZw
We on the rise
write
preview
21 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 6 Sep 2023
Thanks, was too lazy to do this for @orthwyrm here, lol
But why only since May?
And I see, we must have more coments tomorrow to keep the streak going
reply
1188 sats \ 2 replies \ @birdeye21 6 Sep 2023
gpt was having trouble with the full set of data for whatever reason
I mainly just wanted to convey that recent exponential growth anyway, comments ranged around 10-40 for a long time prior to August from what I glanced at
reply
1518 sats \ 0 replies \ @davidw 7 Sep 2023
Even exponential tech can’t comprehend exponential gainz
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 6 Sep 2023
gpt was having trouble with the full set of data for whatever reason
interesting, lol
we could to the same for "sats spent in daily discussion"
reply
32 sats \ 0 replies \ @carlosfandango 6 Sep 2023
Very very cool
reply