Look at this gem that bitcoin-Twitter found:
Case closed?
746 sats \ 1 reply \ @eduardopro OP 4 Sep 2023
People, this post is a sequel to this other post that contains a very telling video --> #241855
Please watch both before commenting.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nemo 4 Sep 2023
deleted by author
reply
1497 sats \ 21 replies \ @inverselarp 4 Sep 2023
Using nonsense like this make anti-DC crowd so pathetic. Paul was absolutely right at the time. BCash could have won and you really dont need decentralization for most txns (look at tron or any stablecoin).
Yet those 0.1% cases makes the huge difference but assuming that fiat-brains realize that is naive. Fortunately, Bitcoin won back in the day but things might change. Dont you view eg. Eth as BCash like alternative? Because they are winning in lot of metrics already. Not because they are more decentralized.
reply
3228 sats \ 12 replies \ @Ribbit 4 Sep 2023
Nuance has been lost in this debate
reply
0 sats \ 10 replies \ @eduardopro OP 4 Sep 2023
How do we get it back, though?
reply
11 sats \ 5 replies \ @faithandcredit 4 Sep 2023
If Drivechain was a good idea then there wouldnt be any doubt? Change my mind :)
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @elvismercury 4 Sep 2023
Was Segwit a good idea?
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @inverselarp 4 Sep 2023
If i was Vitalik i would spread this exact FUD inside Bitcoin community.
reply
1 sat \ 2 replies \ @faithandcredit 4 Sep 2023
Or you would be trying to get Drivechain adopted
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @inverselarp 4 Sep 2023
Tell me you are 13yo without telling me you are 13yo.
reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @faithandcredit 4 Sep 2023
At this point you dont seem like a credible person
reply on another page
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Ribbit 4 Sep 2023
Well. Once Drive chain goes through we won't have to listen to the dumb arguments against it. We can all each decide based on our preferences because drivechain moves changes to layer 2. Instead of arguing or the future of bitcoin, we keep bitcoin solid and pick what we want on layer 2
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @eduardopro OP 4 Sep 2023
Drivechains are not going through.
They shall not pass.
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @DiracDelta 4 Sep 2023
The biggest feature anyone has ever been able to compellingly argue that Drivechain provides is that it will make the Drivechainers shut up. Does that seem compelling to you?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @orthzar 4 Sep 2023
Reality is more absurd than parody, so DC being accepted in exchange for silence would be par for the course.
Though, I don't think DC will ever be accepted, because most people never hear about these debates at all.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nemo 4 Sep 2023
deleted by author
reply
536 sats \ 2 replies \ @eduardopro OP 4 Sep 2023
LOL,
Tron? Stablecoins? Eth? Bcash?
Do you mean shitcoins?
No, he wasn't right. He was dead wrong and so are you.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @DiracDelta 4 Sep 2023
I love when shitcoiners come in to defend someone and makes things abundantly clear for onlookers 😂
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @eduardopro OP 4 Sep 2023
Exactly.
And that's also the point of the original image, it shows who Paul Sztorc really is.
reply
50 sats \ 1 reply \ @badabing 4 Sep 2023
What a load of bs. Decentralization is the whole point. Bcash is a failure.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @eduardopro OP 4 Sep 2023
Exactly. The whole point.
reply
151 sats \ 0 replies \ @SpaceHodler 4 Sep 2023
You don't need decentralization for most txs, that's why we have L2 solutions.
You do need decentralization to prevent the debasement of the unit of account though, or more generally state / institutional capture.
An insufficiently decentralized coin would have been useless and ruined people's generational wealth had they been foolish enough to put their wealth into it.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @TwoLargePizzas 4 Sep 2023
No, it couldn't have won because it didn't win. The market decided. Markets are not random, they are people casting their vote with skin the game. Your opinion doesn't magically rewrite history.
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @inverselarp 4 Sep 2023
I expect you are billionaire because you already know which way any market will go since we are living in deterministic universe, correct?
reply
65 sats \ 15 replies \ @nemo 4 Sep 2023
deleted by author
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @DiracDelta 4 Sep 2023
I wouldn't and I didn't. Many people were around back then.
reply
10 sats \ 2 replies \ @nemo 4 Sep 2023
deleted by author
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @DiracDelta 4 Sep 2023
I will admit though that I did not have a great understanding at the time, but more of a heuristic approach of "yeah, these guys seem to be on the right side of thing and these other guys do not".
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nemo 4 Sep 2023
deleted by author
reply
0 sats \ 10 replies \ @eduardopro OP 4 Sep 2023
No, I wouldn't.
Because Bchash wasn't cool.
It was stupid. And so are Drivechains.
reply
375 sats \ 2 replies \ @nemo 4 Sep 2023
deleted by author
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @eduardopro OP 4 Sep 2023
You can read The Blocksize War for free here --> https://blog.bitmex.com/?s=blocksize+war&lang=en_us
Cheers!
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nemo 4 Sep 2023
deleted by author
reply
0 sats \ 6 replies \ @ek 4 Sep 2023
So you never said dumb stuff in your life?
reply
21 sats \ 5 replies \ @eduardopro OP 4 Sep 2023
I do, from time to time.
Do you think it's not possible for people to pay you to say dumb stuff?
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @ek 4 Sep 2023
Good point, I do
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @nemo 4 Sep 2023
deleted by author
reply
125 sats \ 1 reply \ @Ribbit 4 Sep 2023
He goes back and forth depending on who is in the room or tweet thread. He is just trying to keep the bitcoin community together
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @nemo 4 Sep 2023
deleted by author
reply on another page
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @eduardopro OP 4 Sep 2023
Hey, Adam Back is a legend in my book, but I don't respect that he's in bed with the Tether people.
You can disagree with people you admire.
reply
121 sats \ 1 reply \ @jk_14 4 Sep 2023
Good discovery.
Easy to see who is farsighted, and who IS NOT.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @eduardopro OP 4 Sep 2023
Exactly.
These other commenters acting as if the tweet doesn't speak volumes are suspicious as fuck.
Did you see this video, by the way? --> #241855
reply
140 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 4 Sep 2023
That's not evidence that "big blockers are behind Paul Sztorc's Drivechains theory". That's just a hint and a tweet out of context that mentions his position regarding selling BCH for BTC afaict.
You have a link for that tweet?
reply
31 sats \ 2 replies \ @eduardopro OP 4 Sep 2023
Look, he's not going to admit that Roger Ver and them are behind his company and the Drivechains nonsense.
However, there's this video --> #241855
And this tweet --> https://twitter.com/Truthcoin/status/891803506134458368
So far.
reply
1022 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 4 Sep 2023
I didn't say he's not backed.
I'm just trying to hold up standards in this discussion.
Using a simple screenshot of a tweet without even a link as "evidence" is ridiculous from any side of any discussion
reply
375 sats \ 0 replies \ @eduardopro OP 4 Sep 2023
I know it wasn't clear at first that this was the second post in a series. My mistake.
You did hold the standard, and I already gave you the link to the tweet and the video. Those are pieces of evidence.
I know I haven't proved anything yet and none of us were in those backdoor meetings to verify, but the situation does look suspicious. Hopefully, more will be revealed.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @huluvublue 4 Sep 2023
Lol an evil Bcasher in our midst trying to hijack the protocol! I saw a repost of this damning EVIDENCE
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @eduardopro OP 4 Sep 2023
BCashers have their own chain already! LOL.
reply