0 sats \ 2 replies \ @premitive1 OP 28 Jul 2023 \ parent \ on: Sending lightning in SN isn't zapping. Fight me. nostr
ah, the plot thickens! So we SHOULD not call it zapping when we send someone numbers from one centralized SN account to another centralized SN account. point taken.
write
preview
13 sats \ 1 reply \ @iguano 28 Jul 2023
Exactly, you cannot “zap” if there is not lightning.
reply
13 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 28 Jul 2023
That's probably the best argument against calling it zaps on SN.
But still, it's sats moving between users which you can withdraw using lightning ...
It's a zap with extra steps
reply